EVM
Providers using this tag (55)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Developing 14 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 23 Limited public surface area
Emerging 16 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (57)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 6 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 37 Limited public surface area
Emerging 13 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (21)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “EVM” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 55 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged EVM, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 40.7 | 23.4 | +17.3 | 55 |
| Discoverability | 70.9 | 61.2 | +9.7 | 55 |
| Contract Quality | 29.3 | 19.8 | +9.5 | 55 |
| Operational Transparency | 20.3 | 14 | +6.3 | 55 |
| Access Clarity | 27.6 | 26.5 | +1.1 | 55 |
| Contract Governance | 6.5 | 6.4 | +0.1 | 55 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 11% | 10% | +1 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 24% | 13% | +11 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 2% | 11% | -9 |
| Security | 100% | 97% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 16% | 14% | +2 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Optimism Etherscan 50.4
- 2 Arbiscan 48.4
- 3 0G Labs 47.1
- 4 WealthVille — DeFi Liquidity Pool Scores API (Solana & EVM) 44.2
- 5 Pocket Network 44.1
- 6 Basescan 44
- 7 Zircuit 43.5
- 8 Gunzilla Games 43.2
- 9 Syndicate 43
- 10 BscScan 41.3
- 1 WealthVille — DeFi Liquidity Pool Scores API (Solana & EVM) 44.2
- 2 Seismic Systems 36.7
- 3 Futureverse 35.3
- 4 Syndicate 34.9
- 5 Blockscout 34.5
- 6 Boost 34.2
- 7 Etherscan 32.9
- 8 ParaSwap 30.9
- 9 0G Labs 30.6
- 10 Gunzilla Games 29.3
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.