Smart Contracts
SMART_CONTRACTSSmart Contracts
Providers using this tag (127)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 26 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 24 Limited public surface area
Emerging 50 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 19 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 4 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (64)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 12 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 32 Limited public surface area
Emerging 17 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (34)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Smart Contracts” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 122 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Smart Contracts, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 40.8 | 23.4 | +17.4 | 122 |
| Discoverability | 65.4 | 61.2 | +4.2 | 122 |
| Operational Transparency | 17.9 | 14 | +3.9 | 122 |
| Contract Quality | 21.7 | 19.8 | +1.9 | 122 |
| Contract Governance | 5.1 | 6.4 | -1.3 | 122 |
| Access Clarity | 19 | 26.5 | -7.5 | 122 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 10% | 10% | 0 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 16% | 13% | +3 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 2% | 11% | -9 |
| Security | 97% | 97% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 16% | 14% | +2 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Solidus Labs 65.1
- 2 OpenZeppelin 61.6
- 3 Aptos 58.8
- 4 0x 56.3
- 5 SIMBA Chain 52.3
- 6 Aeternity 50.5
- 7 Stellar 49.8
- 8 Supra 49.2
- 9 Linea 48.9
- 10 Algorand 48.8
- 1 Art Blocks 41.3
- 2 SIMBA Chain 39.4
- 3 Hedera 37.8
- 4 Aeternity 37.4
- 5 Aelf 37.3
- 6 Gala Games 37
- 7 Seismic Systems 36.7
- 8 Supra 35.6
- 9 Nervos 34.9
- 10 Mysten Labs 34.5
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.