emerging · 0.2 capabilitymarket actiondomain

Custody

Score 21.8 / 100 47 providers +6 via APIs 25 APIs Search apis.io →
Business capabilities this tag reaches
Capital Markets Operations Management 1

Providers using this tag (47)

Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.

Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 6 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 17 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 6 Almost no public developer surface

APIs with this tag (24)

Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →

Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 7 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 6 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented

Companies reaching this through an API (6)

These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Custody” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.

B3 (Brasil Bolsa Balcão) BNY Mellon Northern Trust NOWPayments SIX UBS

Score breakdown

Frequency
50.3
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
1.2
spread across providers
Quality lift
44.6
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
0.0
strength of nearest seed neighbor

Related tags

Institutional 13 co-occurrences Digital Assets 25 co-occurrences Staking 15 co-occurrences FIX 5 co-occurrences Settlement 9 co-occurrences Tokenization 10 co-occurrences Transfers 9 co-occurrences

Where this tag comes from

Provider tag47
Api tag25

Cohort brief

Auto-generated

The 47 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Custody, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.

Providers
47
all scored
Mean Kin Score
36.3
+13.4 vs catalog 22.9
Mean Agent Readiness
22.1
+10.2 vs catalog 11.9
Spread
0–68
median 43.2 · σ 18.9
How the 47 split by band
Exemplar 2Strong 5Developing 18Thin 9Emerging 7Minimal 6
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
FacetThis cohortCatalogDifferenceScored
Developer Ergonomics 41.4 23.2 +18.2 47
Operational Transparency 29.7 13.7 +16 47
Contract Quality 30.6 17.6 +13 47
Access Clarity 36.2 26.5 +9.7 47
Discoverability 65.4 58.1 +7.3 47
Contract Governance 11.8 6.3 +5.5 47

A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.

What this cohort publishes
ArtifactThis cohortCatalogDifference
MCP server (any) 17% 14% +3
MCP server (first-party) 19% 12% +7
Agent Skills 0% 0% 0
OAuth scopes 26% 11% +15
Security 100% 98% +2
Arazzo workflows 4% 2% +2
Governance rules 13% 14% -1

mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.

Top by Kin Score
  1. 1 Kraken 68
  2. 2 Gemini Trust Company 67.5
  3. 3 Fireblocks 64.5
  4. 4 Bullish 60.8
  5. 5 Citi 57.5
  6. 6 Brale 56.2
  7. 7 Ripple Labs 55.6
  8. 8 Zero Hash 54.2
  9. 9 Fordefi 53.3
  10. 10 Utila 52.9
Top by Agent Readiness
  1. 1 Citi 52.3
  2. 2 Ripple Labs 51.8
  3. 3 Brale 51.6
  4. 4 Gemini Trust Company 50.1
  5. 5 Anchorage Digital 47.5
  6. 6 Paxos 46.5
  7. 7 tZERO 44.4
  8. 8 AltoIRA 42.6
  9. 9 Figment 41.8
  10. 10 Bakkt 39
All 47 members of this roster resolve to a scored provider in the catalog.
Coverage caveat. 42 of 47 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.

Work with this as data

Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for tags

7 MCP tools reach this
  • find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.
  • get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.
  • cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.
  • cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.
  • apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
  • resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
  • find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page
This tag
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/custody"
All tags
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
As a scored cohort
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/custody"
The distribution (Pro)
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/custody/stats" \
  -H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"

Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.

Get an API key

Free tier, no form to fill in. Signing in shares your email address with us — we store it to create your key and to recognise you if you sign in with another provider. See our Privacy Policy and Terms.

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.