Tax
TaxesTax
Providers using this tag (107)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 14 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 18 Limited public surface area
Emerging 40 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 29 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (82)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 14 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 9 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 25 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 20 Limited public surface area
Emerging 12 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (50)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Tax” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
107 providers carry this tag directly, and 135 counting the 12 narrower tags below — 28 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| E-invoicing and Tax Compliance (certified operators) | 41% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 103 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Tax, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 29.9 | 23.9 | +6 | 103 |
| Discoverability | 59.2 | 57.9 | +1.3 | 103 |
| Operational Transparency | 12.9 | 13 | -0.1 | 103 |
| Contract Quality | 16.8 | 17.2 | -0.4 | 103 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 22.8 | 23.2 | -0.4 | 103 |
| Contract Governance | 5.5 | 6.5 | -1 | 103 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 16% | 13% | +3 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 14% | 12% | +2 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 7% | 11% | -4 |
| Security | 98% | 98% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 4% | 2% | +2 |
| Governance rules | 13% | 16% | -3 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Avalara 69.9
- 2 FlowAccount 59.3
- 3 Intuit 57.7
- 4 Wingspan 56.5
- 5 flatin.pt 55.6
- 6 OptionsAhoy 53.9
- 7 Cadana 48.2
- 8 inFakt 48.2
- 9 Swap 47.5
- 10 MileIQ 45.2
- 1 Anrok 57.4
- 2 OptionsAhoy 50.2
- 3 Avalara 44.6
- 4 Kintsugi 44.2
- 5 MileIQ 41.2
- 6 Taxley (UK Corporation Tax API) 41.1
- 7 Cadana 38.9
- 8 Intuit 37.1
- 9 Vertex 34.1
- 10 flatin.pt 33.2
Coverage caveat. 97 of 103 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.