Tax
TaxesTax
Providers using this tag (162)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 5 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 7 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 27 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 34 Limited public surface area
Emerging 54 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 34 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (92)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 21 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 15 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 27 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 16 Limited public surface area
Emerging 11 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (61)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Tax” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 61 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
162 providers carry this tag directly, and 196 counting the 12 narrower tags below — 34 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| E-invoicing and Tax Compliance (certified operators) | 41% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 147 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Tax, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 35.7 | 30 | +5.7 | 147 |
| Discoverability | 61.9 | 59.1 | +2.8 | 147 |
| Operational Transparency | 15.4 | 13.2 | +2.2 | 147 |
| Contract Quality | 20.5 | 18.6 | +1.9 | 147 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 25.2 | 24.5 | +0.7 | 147 |
| Contract Governance | 10.2 | 9.7 | +0.5 | 147 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 26% | 18% | +8 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 25% | 16% | +9 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 14% | 13% | +1 |
| Security | 99% | 99% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 1% | +2 |
| Governance rules | 37% | 36% | +1 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Intuit 70.8
- 2 Avalara 69.3
- 3 FlowAccount 68.2
- 4 Wingspan 67.7
- 5 Thomson Reuters 66.9
- 6 CukaiMax 64.1
- 7 QuickBooks 59.2
- 8 flatin.pt 57.5
- 9 Conecta Media LLC 57.1
- 10 africacompliancedata-com 56.4
- 1 arcandledger-com 58.9
- 2 Anrok 57.4
- 3 AI2Fin 55.6
- 4 cryptotaxedge-com 52.9
- 5 OptionsAhoy 50.2
- 6 Conecta Media LLC 48.5
- 7 stackin-io 48.1
- 8 Reach 47.9
- 9 CukaiMax 47.5
- 10 Intuit 45.4
Coverage caveat. 117 of 147 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 14 November 2026, across 41591 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.