Fashion
Providers using this tag (232)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 18 Limited public surface area
Emerging 67 Early or largely undocumented
IRIZ PlatformMake the DotUrban RevivoItalistUnmadeModclothUSPL WrognBotikaBaubleBarYoona.aiShoptiquesCuyanaAMI ParisAnine BingThe Business of FashionGrailedTrendsiJoorBrandbackPoshmarkRoss StoresTory BurchHalaraCurtsyFashinzaGarmentoryKupiVIPTapstitchThe House Of LR&CLeflairPickleEloquiiPlushEnjoeiStylightHijUpWE11DONESXDAnotherSonansuScoopCentric BrandsAmerican Eagle OutfittersM.GemiVivrelleAllbirdsAI modelAdidaseverlaneThamarah Al-Jill Co LLCRoujeBelkAbercrombie and FitchAdore MeCladwellANN Inc.GapVintedFleekNuORDERAmer SportsAéropostaleCUUPVastrmBrooks BrothersEDITEDAlta
Minimal 141 Almost no public developer surface
Love BonitoCovetiDiaOtriumShopLookUrbanicUnspunCiderGlosetSavage X FentyVilloidGroyyoCatchfashionBodeDetoureFableticsNewmeLYSTBold MetricsLVMHAdayAce Turtle ServicesSuperCircleFossil GroupvestiairecollectiveCapri HoldingsCarbon38NordstromMUSINSAYOOX NET-A-PORTER (YNAP)Laws of MotionPopChillRent the RunwayH&MnavabiOutfitteryShoeDazzleStyleSageMytheresaInditexAcne StudiosBelle InternationalFarfetchFashionLab NordicGilt GroupeHopShopLulusmogujieMonclerMyntraNa KdPomelo fashionPrivaliaRareLeeSaks OFF 5THSpokeStalkBuyLoveStyleSaintThe RealRealVirgioARIBalaanBandierTechstyle Fashion GroupDabchyHauteLookBoutiqaat99DressesARIVEFashionaraGranaHeartThisIhaveuPolyvoreShopprSnapetteStyleupThreadTradesyTryTry (穿穿)VaunteStitch FixThredUpBlissclubModern MeadowAramyaCoachMejuriMomoxBailey44Bloomingdale'sFoot LockerAscena Retail GroupBonobosJ HilburnMyWearTamara MellonBRND.MEGoat GroupEasel AIKontoor BrandsSimplifyberNikeShowroomprive.comRalph LaurenIn Your ShoeClassif.ioTapestryRebagBejewelVF CorporationGOATKintra FibersGuessVANCLAndie SwimPVHLululemon AthleticaBrodoGentle MonsterPhiaBluestoneCaleresGymboreeJ.Crew GroupkarmaloopLevi StraussMensa BrandsRothysSaks Global (fka Saks Fifth Avenue)SkimsSole SocietyG-III Apparel GroupLNKOCaaStleClothes HorseCraftsvillaLE TOTEQueenlyTwiceWeddington Way
APIs with this tag (10)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 1 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 4 Limited public surface area
Fashion Diffusion Public APIREST API for asynchronous AI fashion generation tasks. Authenticates with a single long-lived bearer API ke...Heuritech Trend Data APIThe commercial Heuritech data API, sold as part of the Business and Enterprise plans. Heuritech's own produ...FINESSE Storefront JSON (read-only)Unauthenticated read-only product endpoints that FINESSE documents for agents in its own agents.md: a paged...FINESSE UCP Commerce MCP APIAgent-facing commerce endpoint implementing the Universal Commerce Protocol (version 2026-04-08, with 2026-...
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
Ann Taylor / LOFT E-Commerce PlatformAnn Taylor and LOFT (formerly Ascena brands, now owned by Sycamore Partners) operate e-commerce platforms w...Classif.io Fashion Style Classification APIOne of the sixteen demo classification APIs Classif.io advertised, named "Fashion Style classification API"...Tapestry APIThe Tapestry API provides access to platform services and data for enterprise integration and automation.
Companies reaching this through an API (1)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Fashion” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Frequency
64.8
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
5.5
spread across providers
Quality lift
12.1
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
17.4
strength of nearest seed neighbor
Where this tag sits
232 providers carry this tag directly, and 307 counting the 1 narrower tag below — 75 more to reach.
Related tags
Apparel 104 co-occurrences
Retail 176 co-occurrences
Luxury 30 co-occurrences
E-Commerce 187 co-occurrences
Resale 23 co-occurrences
Footwear 21 co-occurrences
Direct to Consumer 36 co-occurrences
Shopify 27 co-occurrences
Where this tag comes from
Provider tag235
Api tag10
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| Fashion & Apparel (apparel, footwear, textiles) | 67% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 207 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Fashion, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
Providers
207
of 231 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
even vs catalog
Mean Agent Readiness
5.3
-6.7 vs catalog 12
Spread
–
median · σ
How the 207 split by band
Exemplar 0Strong 3Developing 3Thin 16Emerging 63Minimal 122
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 3.4 | 6.5 | -3.1 | 207 |
| Discoverability | 53.2 | 57.9 | -4.7 | 207 |
| Access Clarity | 16.2 | 23.9 | -7.7 | 207 |
| Operational Transparency | 3.8 | 13 | -9.2 | 207 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 10 | 23.2 | -13.2 | 207 |
| Contract Quality | 3.5 | 17.2 | -13.7 | 207 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
What this cohort publishes
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 14% | 13% | +1 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 5% | 12% | -7 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 14% | 11% | +3 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 2% | 16% | -14 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Top by Kin Score
- 1 depop
- 2 Ximilar
- 3 Perfect Corp
- 4 StockX
- 5 Columbia Sportswear
- 6 MODIVO
- 7 Zalando
- 8 Retraced
- 9 Fashion Diffusion
- 10 Trendyol
Top by Agent Readiness
- 1 Perfect Corp {"score" => 48, "band" => "agent-native"}
- 2 depop {"score" => 41.6, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 3 StockX {"score" => 41.3, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 4 Dolls Kill {"score" => 39.9, "band" => "agent-native"}
- 5 Johnnie-O {"score" => 36.7, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 6 Zalando {"score" => 36.2, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 7 Ximilar {"score" => 33.1, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 8 Retraced {"score" => 31.5, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 9 Columbia Sportswear {"score" => 30.3, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 10 FASHN AI {"score" => 30.2, "band" => "agent-ready"}
All 231 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the
catalog; 207 carry a score (90%).
The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 204 of 207 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 31 October 2026, across 31983 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Coverage caveat. 204 of 207 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 31 October 2026, across 31983 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.