Apparel
Providers using this tag (179)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 13 Limited public surface area
Emerging 64 Early or largely undocumented
Rhone ApparelBombasUNTUCKitMake the DotGymsharkUnmadeUbrasModclothAllbirdsCotopaxiAdidaseverlaneLord & TaylorStanceAnine BingAbercrombie and FitchJOLYNAdore MeVuoriFast RetailingDillard'sSayshTeespringFashinzaFIGSKupiVIPTapstitchThe Players TrunkCUUPEloquiiCitykartLivsn DesignsPrimarySXDCarter'sRock The BellsMaisonetteCentric BrandsUrban RevivoAmerican Eagle OutfittersUSPL WrognAI modelMORIBespoke PostCuyanaHill HouseBelkThe Black TuxmoodytigerBurlington StoresTrue & CoTrendsiGapTory BurchHalaraAtomsGarmentoryThe House Of LR&CAmer SportsHemsterVastrmBrooks BrothersHijUpWE11DONE
Minimal 98 Almost no public developer surface
Stitch FixBlissclubCoachHoneyloveOnOtriumRossignolUrbanicBailey44FlagshipRTLFoot LockerAscena Retail GroupBonobosHarley-DavidsonOutdoor VoicesGroyyoMyWearGoat GroupKontoor BrandsNewmeNikeBosieRalph LaurenIn Your ShoeBold MetricsHuckberryBruntINDOSMtailorGenescoVF CorporationGOATCarbon38GuessJ.C. PenneyVANCLWolverine World WideLululemon AthleticaRent the RunwayThirdLoveHanesbrandsInditexGymboreeJ.Crew GroupLevi StraussLulusMeUndiesPatPatPomelo fashionQuinceSkimsThreadless ( Skinny CM Holdings)Topo AthleticBellaroseapparelCastoreG-III Apparel GroupSyrup99degrees CustomClothes HorseFashionaraPeachLove BonitoAramyaDiaDswUnspunCiderSavage X FentyVilloidJ HilburnTamara MellonChico's FAS360leiliangFableticsClassif.ioDigital RoomAdayCapri HoldingsKintra FibersMUSINSAPVHH&MnavabiAcne StudiosBelle InternationalCaleresFashionLab NordicMonclerRothysSpokeStalkBuyLoveStyleSaintTechstyle Fashion GroupTailored BrandsCrocsL BrandsBon-Ton StoresGrana
APIs with this tag (2)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Frequency
61.4
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
4.2
spread across providers
Quality lift
13.1
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
14.6
strength of nearest seed neighbor
Where this tag sits
Related tags
Fashion 104 co-occurrences
Direct to Consumer 57 co-occurrences
Footwear 25 co-occurrences
Retail 145 co-occurrences
Shopify 36 co-occurrences
E-Commerce 141 co-occurrences
Universal Commerce Protocol 20 co-occurrences
Agentic Commerce 27 co-occurrences
Where this tag comes from
Provider tag180
Api tag2
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| Fashion & Apparel (apparel, footwear, textiles) | 51% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 169 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Apparel, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
Providers
169
of 179 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
even vs catalog
Mean Agent Readiness
6.5
-5.5 vs catalog 12
Spread
–
median · σ
How the 169 split by band
Exemplar 0Strong 1Developing 3Thin 13Emerging 58Minimal 94
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 4.3 | 6.5 | -2.2 | 169 |
| Discoverability | 54.4 | 57.9 | -3.5 | 169 |
| Access Clarity | 16.1 | 23.9 | -7.8 | 169 |
| Operational Transparency | 2.5 | 13 | -10.5 | 169 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 10.7 | 23.2 | -12.5 | 169 |
| Contract Quality | 2.9 | 17.2 | -14.3 | 169 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
What this cohort publishes
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 20% | 13% | +7 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 6% | 12% | -6 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 18% | 11% | +7 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 2% | 16% | -14 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Top by Kin Score
- 1 Perfect Corp
- 2 Columbia Sportswear
- 3 Spreadshirt
- 4 True Fit
- 5 Dolls Kill
- 6 Tecovas
- 7 3D Look
- 8 FINESSE
- 9 Moda Operandi
- 10 Scalable Press
Top by Agent Readiness
- 1 Perfect Corp {"score" => 48, "band" => "agent-native"}
- 2 Tecovas {"score" => 41.5, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 3 Fnatic {"score" => 40, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 4 Dolls Kill {"score" => 39.9, "band" => "agent-native"}
- 5 Johnnie-O {"score" => 36.7, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 6 Spreadshirt {"score" => 33.4, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 7 Rhone Apparel {"score" => 32.4, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 8 Columbia Sportswear {"score" => 30.3, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 9 Urban Outfitters {"score" => 30.2, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 10 100 Thieves {"score" => 29.5, "band" => "agent-ready"}
All 179 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the
catalog; 169 carry a score (94%).
The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 167 of 169 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 31 October 2026, across 31983 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Coverage caveat. 167 of 169 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 31 October 2026, across 31983 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.