Markets · bedrock market · provisional
News and Media
Register (c2pa conforming products). The Kin Score Market layer reads each provider in its market:
who it integrates with, how deep those integrations go, and where the market publishes its own structure.
Methodology.
27providers measured
7 (25.9%)declare their own
1 (3.7%)covered by others only
1 (3.7%)distribution only (sell through, not integrations)
18 (66.7%)undeclared
3declare compatibility (report only, not weighted)
0in-market workflows shown
Provisional. Provisional and unweighted: the Market layer is not part of the composite or agent readiness. Leader lists are read within a position, never as one ranking. A provider that declares nothing we can
read is shown as undeclared, with no number: we never infer integrations.
Where this market publishes its structure
- C2PA conforming products list, c2pa-org/conformance-public conforming-products-list.json (applicant, product, assurance, spec version) machine-readable
- IPTC current members (NewsML-G2, ninjs, Photo Metadata) not machine-readable: GlueUp widget behind a Cloudflare challenge, 403 (2026-10-15)
- NewsML-G2 / ninjs adopters not machine-readable: 'Who's using it' prose pages, no list
- C2PA / Content Authenticity Initiative membership not machine-readable: c2pa.org/membership is HTML logos; the conformance list is the readable register
- News-aggregator source lists not machine-readable: no machine-readable register of publishers found
Own = declares at least one integration itself; covered = visible only because an aggregator, standards body, regulator or partner contract names it; distribution-only = listed only on cloud marketplaces it sells through, a channel reported beside, never counted as its own declared integrations; undeclared = nothing we can read, so no number; declares_compatibility = providers with a `compatible` shape vote, report only (kin, 2026-10-13): never counted as own, never in depth or position.
Taxonomy how this market maps onto apis.io
Derived 2026-10-15 from the 27 providers in this market we could resolve in the
catalog. The percentage is the share of those providers carrying each one; it describes the market, not the tag or industry. Tag groups have no page of their own yet, so they are listed unlinked.
| Tags | News 74%, MCP 33%, Market Data 26%, Media Monitoring 26%, Finance 22%, Web Scraping 22% |
|---|
| Tag groups | Media 81%, MCP 41%, Real-Time 33%, Media Monitoring 33%, Finance 22%, Data Extraction 22% |
|---|
| Industries | Media 81%, Artificial Intelligence 33%, Data & Analytics 33% |
|---|
| Areas | API Evangelist Search 15% |
|---|
share of resolved cohort carrying it; tags >=0.20 & >=3 members (max 12, junk dropped), tag_groups >=0.20 (cooccurrence, non-cross-cutting; max 8), industries >=0.20 (max 6), areas >=0.10 (max 6; areas are keyword-matched and sparse), capabilities L1 >=0.20 (max 8); derive-market-taxonomy.py