Web Scraping
Providers using this tag (63)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 20 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 16 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 13 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (23)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 7 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 4 Limited public surface area
Emerging 6 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (2)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Web Scraping” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 61 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Web Scraping, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 56.8 | 26.5 | +30.3 | 61 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 51.3 | 23.2 | +28.1 | 61 |
| Contract Quality | 41 | 17.6 | +23.4 | 61 |
| Operational Transparency | 36.9 | 13.7 | +23.2 | 61 |
| Discoverability | 70.2 | 58.1 | +12.1 | 61 |
| Contract Governance | 12.8 | 6.3 | +6.5 | 61 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 54% | 14% | +40 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 51% | 12% | +39 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 15% | 11% | +4 |
| Security | 98% | 98% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 7% | 2% | +5 |
| Governance rules | 28% | 14% | +14 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Browser Use 70.8
- 2 Cracked API 70.3
- 3 Crawl4AI 68.6
- 4 Context.dev 67.2
- 5 ValueSERP 66.2
- 6 Virix Labs 65.7
- 7 Structify 64.5
- 8 WebCrawlerAPI 64.5
- 9 Chocodata 61.7
- 10 Abstract API 61.6
- 1 Cracked API 68.5
- 2 The Hog 65.5
- 3 WebScraping.AI 65
- 4 SearchApi 60.2
- 5 Browser Use 59.6
- 6 Nimbleway 58
- 7 Social Fetch 56.2
- 8 Virix Labs 53.8
- 9 Apify 52.9
- 10 Context.dev 51.4
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.