emerging · -1.3 capability action

Screenshots

Score 21.4 / 100 27 providers +13 via APIs 30 APIs Search apis.io →
Variants seen in the corpus: Screenshotscreenshot-apiScreenshots

Providers using this tag (27)

Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.

Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 12 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface

APIs with this tag (30)

Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →

Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 2 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 19 Limited public surface area
Phrase Screenshots APIThe Screenshots API from Phrase — 2 operation(s) for screenshots.38.9Weblate Screenshots APIThe screenshots API from Weblate — 5 operation(s) for screenshots.36.1Crowdin REST API v2Full-coverage REST API for Crowdin and Crowdin Enterprise. Resources include projects, files, source string...34.6Crowdin Screenshots APIThe Screenshots API from Crowdin — 1 operation(s) for screenshots.34.6Appium Screenshots APIScreenshot capture34.1Quietforge Document Conversion APIConverts Word, Excel, PowerPoint and OpenDocument files with LibreOffice (PDF is an output format, not an i...33.8SiteGrab Screenshot API (LaminarForge) Screenshot APIThe Screenshot API from SiteGrab Screenshot API (LaminarForge) — 1 operation(s) for screenshot.33.4Scrapfly Screenshot APICapture screenshots of web pages with full-page or element-specific capture using CSS selectors. Supports J...33.1Scrapfly Screenshots APIThe Screenshots API from Scrapfly — 1 operation(s) for screenshots.33.1Hubstaff Screenshots APIScreenshots captured while tracking time.32.1Spider Screenshot APICapture full-page or viewport screenshots.31.9SnapAPI Screenshot APIThe Screenshot API from SnapAPI — 1 operation(s) for screenshot.31.3Snap APIREST/HTTP screenshot and rendering API. GET /v1/take (alias /v1/render) captures screenshots and PDFs; /v1/...30.9ScreenshotOne Screenshots APIThe Screenshots API from ScreenshotOne — 1 operation(s) for screenshots.29.9SnapAPI Screenshot APIScreenshot, PDF, and batch capture29.2Tolgee Screenshots APIAttach visual context screenshots to keys.29.1ISHOB Screenshot APIThe Screenshot API from ISHOB — 1 operation(s) for screenshot.28.1Lokalise API v2Full-coverage REST API for the Lokalise TMS. Resources include projects, keys, translations, contributors, ...27.8Lokalise Screenshots APIThe Screenshots API from Lokalise — 1 operation(s) for screenshots.27.8
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented

Companies reaching this through an API (13)

These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Screenshots” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.

Appium BrowserStack Crowdin G2 Hubstaff ISHOB Live Direct Marketing Lokalise Phrase Quietforge Studio Spider Tolgee Weblate

Score breakdown

Frequency
50.8
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
0.6
spread across providers
Quality lift
39.4
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
4.3
strength of nearest seed neighbor

Related tags

Web Scraping 13 co-occurrences Rendering 5 co-occurrences PDF 7 co-occurrences Browser Automation 5 co-occurrences Localization 5 co-occurrences Data Extraction 5 co-occurrences Translation 5 co-occurrences

Where this tag comes from

Provider tag29
Api tag30
Openapi tag18
Openapi op tag38

Cohort brief

Auto-generated

The 26 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Screenshots, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.

Providers
26
of 27 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
38.5
+16.3 vs catalog 22.2
Mean Agent Readiness
28.1
+16.1 vs catalog 12
Spread
5.2–78.7
median 33.5 · σ 17.7
How the 26 split by band
Exemplar 2Strong 4Developing 4Thin 12Emerging 2Minimal 2
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
FacetThis cohortCatalogDifferenceScored
Contract Quality 43.3 17.2 +26.1 26
Developer Ergonomics 42.8 23.2 +19.6 26
Operational Transparency 27.9 13 +14.9 26
Access Clarity 37.6 23.9 +13.7 26
Discoverability 65.3 57.9 +7.4 26
Contract Governance 12.1 6.5 +5.6 26

A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.

What this cohort publishes
ArtifactThis cohortCatalogDifference
MCP server (any) 35% 13% +22
MCP server (first-party) 35% 12% +23
Agent Skills 0% 0% 0
OAuth scopes 8% 11% -3
Security 92% 98% -6
Arazzo workflows 4% 2% +2
Governance rules 46% 16% +30

mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.

Top by Kin Score
  1. 1 Ironfang 78.7
  2. 2 Search1API 71
  3. 3 Abstract API 61.7
  4. 4 Geekflare 61.6
  5. 5 Pagesnap 58.6
  6. 6 APIFreaks - API Hub for Developers 58.4
  7. 7 Sahifa 47.8
  8. 8 WhoAPI 46.4
  9. 9 localscreenshot 41
  10. 10 ScrapingBee 39.9
Top by Agent Readiness
  1. 1 Search1API 57.6
  2. 2 Ironfang 53.5
  3. 3 ScreenshotOne 52.7
  4. 4 Pagesnap 44.8
  5. 5 Abstract API 37.1
  6. 6 PDFShift 36.6
  7. 7 Geekflare 36.2
  8. 8 APIFreaks - API Hub for Developers 36
  9. 9 ZenRows 35.6
  10. 10 API Snap 34.5
All 27 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the catalog; 26 carry a score (96%). The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 18 of 26 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.

Work with this as data

Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for tags

7 MCP tools reach this
  • find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.
  • get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.
  • cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.
  • cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.
  • apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
  • resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
  • find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page
This tag
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/screenshots"
All tags
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
As a scored cohort
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/screenshots"
The distribution (Pro)
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/screenshots/stats" \
  -H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"

Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.

Get an API key

Free tier, no form to fill in. Signing in shares your email address with us — we store it to create your key and to recognise you if you sign in with another provider. See our Privacy Policy and Terms.

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.