Browser Automation
Providers using this tag (36)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 6 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 13 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (17)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 6 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 36 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Browser Automation, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 47.8 | 17.9 | +29.9 | 36 |
| Contract Quality | 39.5 | 17.5 | +22 | 36 |
| Access Clarity | 38.2 | 22.3 | +15.9 | 36 |
| Discoverability | 73.1 | 60.4 | +12.7 | 36 |
| Operational Transparency | 23.7 | 11.3 | +12.4 | 36 |
| Contract Governance | 9.5 | 6.4 | +3.1 | 36 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 50% | 16% | +34 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 28% | 7% | +21 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 6% | 9% | -3 |
| Security | 100% | 88% | +12 |
| Arazzo workflows | 11% | 2% | +9 |
| Governance rules | 28% | 13% | +15 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 WebScraping.AI 62.6
- 2 Coasty 62.2
- 3 Cloudflare 62
- 4 Hyperbrowser 56.4
- 5 H Company 55.1
- 6 Oxylabs 54.7
- 7 Testerarmy 51.7
- 8 Kernel 51.3
- 9 TinyFish 50.7
- 10 ZenRows 50.4
- 1 WebScraping.AI 65
- 2 Yutori 50
- 3 TinyFish 49
- 4 Cloudflare 44.5
- 5 H Company 43.3
- 6 Coasty 42.9
- 7 Kernel 36
- 8 Testerarmy 34.3
- 9 AgentQL 34
- 10 Anchor Browser 34
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/browser-automation"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/browser-automation"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/browser-automation/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.