niche · -1.9 capabilitymarket resourceactiondomainschema

Browser Automation

Score 19.6 / 100 47 providers +3 via APIs 22 APIs Search apis.io →
Variants seen in the corpus: Headless BrowserHeadless BrowsersWeb AutomationBrowser Automation

Providers using this tag (47)

Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.

Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 11 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 10 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 13 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 5 Almost no public developer surface

APIs with this tag (22)

Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →

Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 7 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 8 Limited public surface area
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface

Companies reaching this through an API (3)

These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Browser Automation” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.

APIToolkit (Monoscope) Bright Data Cloudflare

Score breakdown

Frequency
46.3
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
0.6
spread across providers
Quality lift
39.4
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
0.0
strength of nearest seed neighbor

Where this tag sits

Browser Infrastructure 6 providers

Related tags

Proxies 11 co-occurrences Playwright 9 co-occurrences Puppeteer 8 co-occurrences Web Scraping 25 co-occurrences Browser Infrastructure 6 co-occurrences Computer Use 7 co-occurrences Cloud Browser 5 co-occurrences Data Extraction 15 co-occurrences

Where this tag comes from

Provider tag47
Api tag22

Cohort brief

Auto-generated

The 47 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Browser Automation, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.

Providers
47
all scored
Mean Kin Score
39.4
+15.3 vs catalog 24.1
Mean Agent Readiness
29.1
+15.0 vs catalog 14.1
Spread
2.6–71.1
median 42 · σ 19
How the 47 split by band
Exemplar 3Strong 11Developing 10Thin 13Emerging 5Minimal 5
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
FacetThis cohortCatalogDifferenceScored
Developer Ergonomics 49.9 24.5 +25.4 47
Contract Quality 36.7 18.6 +18.1 47
Access Clarity 46.9 30 +16.9 47
Operational Transparency 22.3 13.2 +9.1 47
Discoverability 66 59.1 +6.9 47
Contract Governance 14.2 9.7 +4.5 47

A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.

What this cohort publishes
ArtifactThis cohortCatalogDifference
MCP server (any) 53% 18% +35
MCP server (first-party) 51% 16% +35
Agent Skills 0% 0% 0
OAuth scopes 13% 13% 0
Security 98% 99% -1
Arazzo workflows 9% 1% +8
Governance rules 68% 36% +32

mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.

Top by Kin Score
  1. 1 Browser Use 71.1
  2. 2 MrScraper 70.4
  3. 3 Zyte 67
  4. 4 Coasty 62.8
  5. 5 H Company 61.8
  6. 6 Kernel 60.9
  7. 7 WebScraping.AI 60.9
  8. 8 Microsoft Playwright 60.1
  9. 9 Browserbase 58
  10. 10 Testerarmy 56.9
Top by Agent Readiness
  1. 1 WebScraping.AI 63.3
  2. 2 Browser Use 61.4
  3. 3 Apify 58.8
  4. 4 Anchor Browser 56.1
  5. 5 MrScraper 55.6
  6. 6 Yutori 52
  7. 7 TinyFish 51.5
  8. 8 Coasty 47
  9. 9 Notte 46.6
  10. 10 Browserless 46.1
All 47 members of this roster resolve to a scored provider in the catalog.
Coverage caveat. 29 of 47 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 14 November 2026, across 41591 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.

Work with this as data

Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for tags

7 MCP tools reach this
  • find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.
  • get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.
  • cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.
  • cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.
  • apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
  • resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
  • find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page
This tag
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/browser-automation"
All tags
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
As a scored cohort (paid plan)
The distribution (Pro)

Calls without X-API-Key need no key. Calls with it need a paid plan — get a key.

Get an API key

Free tier, no form to fill in. Signing in shares your email address with us — we store it to create your key and to recognise you if you sign in with another provider. See our Privacy Policy and Terms.

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.