Data Extraction
Data ExtractionData extractiondata extractiondata-extraction
Providers using this tag (75)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 13 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 25 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 17 Limited public surface area
Emerging 9 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 9 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (87)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 10 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 63 Limited public surface area
Emerging 9 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 75 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Data Extraction, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 45.8 | 17.5 | +28.3 | 75 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 36.8 | 17.9 | +18.9 | 75 |
| Access Clarity | 40 | 22.3 | +17.7 | 75 |
| Operational Transparency | 26.1 | 11.3 | +14.8 | 75 |
| Discoverability | 69.1 | 60.4 | +8.7 | 75 |
| Contract Governance | 13 | 6.4 | +6.6 | 75 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 33% | 16% | +17 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 17% | 7% | +10 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 7% | 9% | -2 |
| Security | 93% | 88% | +5 |
| Arazzo workflows | 9% | 2% | +7 |
| Governance rules | 33% | 13% | +20 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Xquik 92.3
- 2 KonbiniAPI 73.7
- 3 Landing.ai 64.2
- 4 Structify 62.6
- 5 WebScraping.AI 62.6
- 6 Nanonets 60.3
- 7 GoNitro 59.8
- 8 Instabase 58.3
- 9 Nitro Software 57.5
- 10 Hyperbrowser 56.4
- 1 Xquik 82.9
- 2 WebScraping.AI 65
- 3 TinyFish 49
- 4 Nimbleway 41.8
- 5 Eigenpal 40.8
- 6 Bem 39.2
- 7 Structify 37.9
- 8 KonbiniAPI 36.9
- 9 Nitro Software 35.7
- 10 Nace Ai 34.9
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/data-extraction"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/data-extraction"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/data-extraction/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.