Providers using this tag (77)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 14 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 31 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 23 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (48)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 8 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 19 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 15 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 77 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged OCR, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 49.1 | 17.5 | +31.6 | 77 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 41.6 | 17.9 | +23.7 | 77 |
| Access Clarity | 43.9 | 22.3 | +21.6 | 77 |
| Operational Transparency | 31.9 | 11.3 | +20.6 | 77 |
| Discoverability | 72.5 | 60.4 | +12.1 | 77 |
| Contract Governance | 12.6 | 6.4 | +6.2 | 77 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 32% | 16% | +16 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 16% | 7% | +9 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 10% | 9% | +1 |
| Security | 97% | 88% | +9 |
| Arazzo workflows | 9% | 2% | +7 |
| Governance rules | 31% | 13% | +18 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Adobe 80.4
- 2 Adobe Suite 71.2
- 3 Affinda 64.7
- 4 S&P Global 64.6
- 5 Landing.ai 64.2
- 6 Payabli 63.5
- 7 APIFreaks - API Hub for Developers 62.9
- 8 Nanonets 60.3
- 9 GoNitro 59.8
- 10 Ocrolus 57.9
- 1 S&P Global 63.7
- 2 Adobe Suite 61.5
- 3 Roboflow 54
- 4 Kensho 53.2
- 5 Candis 51.3
- 6 Payabli 50.3
- 7 Adobe 46.6
- 8 Dedalus Labs 42.8
- 9 Eigenpal 40.8
- 10 Ocrolus 38.7
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/ocr"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/ocr"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/ocr/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.