niche · 0.6 capability resourceaction

Document AI

Score 18.7 / 100 26 providers +2 via APIs 6 APIs Search apis.io →

Providers using this tag (26)

Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.

Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
NanonetsArtificial IntelligenceOCRIntelligent Document Processing3 APIs57.1
Developing 6 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
InstabaseCompanyIntelligent Document ProcessingArtificial Intelligence1 API51.8ParseForMeDocument ParsingOCRData Extraction1 API49.5AnvilPDFPDF FillingPDF GenerationE-Signature2 APIs46.8SchemaExtractIDPData ExtractionPDF/OCR-to-JSON2 APIs44.1LuminaryCompanyEstate PlanningWealth ManagementFinancial Services1 API42.5Indico DataCompanyIntelligent Document ProcessingIntelligent Process Automation1 API40.0
Thin 11 Limited public surface area
V7Artificial IntelligenceTraining DataData LabelingAnnotation1 API36.9ParseflowDocument ParsingPDFOCRText Extraction1 API36.8TensorlakeDocument ExtractionData ExtractionDocument IngestionDocument Parsing1 API36.8ExtendDocument ProcessingIntelligent Document ProcessingOCR1 API36.1SensibleArtificial IntelligenceIDPExtraction1 API34.1ZuvaArtificial IntelligenceContract AnalysisField Extraction1 API33.7Azure AI Document IntelligenceArtificial IntelligenceAzureIDP1 API33.0EvisortContract Lifecycle ManagementContract IntelligenceLegal Tech1 API29.5HyperscienceArtificial IntelligenceIDPEnterprise1 API29.5RossumArtificial IntelligenceIDPInvoices1 API29.3CoverforceCompanyInsuranceInsurtechCommercial Insurance1 API27.0
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
DocuPandaArtificial IntelligenceDocument ExtractionDocument IntelligenceIDP10 APIs25.9CytoraInsuranceUnited KingdomInsurtechCommercial Insurance2 APIs24.7HebbiaArtificial IntelligenceDue DiligenceEnterprise Search2 APIs19.8WeavCompanyArtificial IntelligenceInsuranceInsurtech1 API16.2KlippaArtificial IntelligenceIDPOCR3 APIs12.4
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
Togal.AIConstructionConstruction TechnologyAECEstimating9.2EigenCompanyIntelligent Document ProcessingData Extraction3.4
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
ImpiraCompanyIntelligent Document ProcessingMachine Learning

APIs with this tag (5)

Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →

Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
OCI AI Vision APIServerless AI service for image analysis and document understanding, supporting object detection, image cla...66.0
Developing 2 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Anvil Document AI & OCR APIExtract structured data from uploaded PDF documents using AI-powered OCR, automatic field detection, box fi...46.8Cognite Document AI APIThe Document AI API from Cognite — 2 operation(s) for document ai.41.5
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
Cytora Platform APICytora's production REST API for digital risk processing — the "preferred method" of submission intake desc...24.7Weav.ai Decisioning Platform APIREST API for the Weav.ai Decisioning Platform, exposing document, folder, form, agent, workflow, action, an...16.2

Companies reaching this through an API (2)

These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Document AI” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.

Cognite Oracle

Score breakdown

Frequency
41.7
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
0.7
spread across providers
Quality lift
39.6
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
1.5
strength of nearest seed neighbor

Related tags

IDP 8 co-occurrences Intelligent Document Processing 6 co-occurrences OCR 11 co-occurrences Data Extraction 9 co-occurrences Classification 5 co-occurrences Workflows 10 co-occurrences REST 10 co-occurrences File 5 co-occurrences

Where this tag comes from

Provider tag26
Api tag6
Openapi tag1
Openapi op tag2

Cohort brief

Auto-generated

The 25 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Document AI, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.

Providers
25
all scored
Mean Kin Score
32.2
+9.3 vs catalog 22.9
Mean Agent Readiness
20.9
+9.0 vs catalog 11.9
Spread
3.4–57.1
median 33.7 · σ 13
How the 25 split by band
Exemplar 0Strong 1Developing 6Thin 11Emerging 5Minimal 2
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
FacetThis cohortCatalogDifferenceScored
Contract Quality 33.6 17.6 +16 25
Access Clarity 37 26.5 +10.5 25
Discoverability 66.7 58.1 +8.6 25
Operational Transparency 21.9 13.7 +8.2 25
Developer Ergonomics 31.1 23.2 +7.9 25
Contract Governance 4.9 6.3 -1.4 25

A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.

What this cohort publishes
ArtifactThis cohortCatalogDifference
MCP server (any) 19% 14% +5
MCP server (first-party) 19% 12% +7
Agent Skills 0% 0% 0
OAuth scopes 15% 11% +4
Security 96% 98% -2
Arazzo workflows 4% 2% +2
Governance rules 12% 14% -2

mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.

Top by Kin Score
  1. 1 Nanonets 57.1
  2. 2 Instabase 51.8
  3. 3 ParseForMe 49.5
  4. 4 Anvil 46.8
  5. 5 SchemaExtract 44.1
  6. 6 Luminary 42.5
  7. 7 Indico Data 40
  8. 8 V7 36.9
  9. 9 Parseflow 36.8
  10. 10 Tensorlake 36.8
Top by Agent Readiness
  1. 1 Anvil 57.9
  2. 2 Nanonets 53.9
  3. 3 Extend 47.1
  4. 4 ParseForMe 34.7
  5. 5 Parseflow 32
  6. 6 SchemaExtract 29.7
  7. 7 Instabase 29.2
  8. 8 Luminary 27.2
  9. 9 Azure AI Document Intelligence 24.5
  10. 10 V7 21.5
All 26 members of this roster resolve to a scored provider in the catalog.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.

Work with this as data

Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for tags

7 MCP tools reach this
  • find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.
  • get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.
  • cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.
  • cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.
  • apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
  • resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
  • find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page
This tag 
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/document-ai"
All tags 
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
As a scored cohort 
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/document-ai"
The distribution (Pro) 
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/document-ai/stats" \
  -H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"

Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.

Get an API key

Free tier, no form to fill in. Signing in shares your email address with us — we store it to create your key and to recognise you if you sign in with another provider. See our Privacy Policy and Terms.

GitHub Google LinkedIn

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.