Classification
Classificationclassification
Providers using this tag (47)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 9 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 10 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 19 Limited public surface area
Emerging 8 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (48)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 9 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 19 Limited public surface area
Emerging 9 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 47 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Classification, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 46.8 | 17.5 | +29.3 | 47 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 39.7 | 17.9 | +21.8 | 47 |
| Operational Transparency | 27.9 | 11.3 | +16.6 | 47 |
| Access Clarity | 38 | 22.3 | +15.7 | 47 |
| Discoverability | 71.2 | 60.4 | +10.8 | 47 |
| Contract Governance | 14.4 | 6.4 | +8 | 47 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 34% | 16% | +18 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 19% | 7% | +12 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 23% | 9% | +14 |
| Security | 96% | 88% | +8 |
| Arazzo workflows | 17% | 2% | +15 |
| Governance rules | 43% | 13% | +30 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Context.dev 68.1
- 2 ServiceNow 64.8
- 3 Confluence 63.7
- 4 Palo Alto Networks 63.7
- 5 Avalara 63.6
- 6 Factiva 61.9
- 7 UiPath 61.7
- 8 Mindee 57.6
- 9 ALTR 56.3
- 10 Picsart 55
- 1 Context.dev 57.7
- 2 Confluence 50
- 3 Agnost AI 48.3
- 4 ALTR 47.9
- 5 Avalara 46.9
- 6 Factiva 43.3
- 7 Palo Alto Networks 39.4
- 8 Arthur Online 37.9
- 9 ServiceNow 35.3
- 10 Veryfi 35.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/classification"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/classification"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/classification/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.