Documents
Documentsdocuments
Providers using this tag (65)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 11 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 19 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 17 Limited public surface area
Emerging 10 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 4 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 2 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (432)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 12 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 66 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 175 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 132 Limited public surface area
Emerging 44 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (367)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Documents” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 367 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 60 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Documents, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 42.6 | 19.8 | +22.8 | 60 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 43.3 | 23.4 | +19.9 | 60 |
| Access Clarity | 44.5 | 26.5 | +18 | 60 |
| Operational Transparency | 31.4 | 13.9 | +17.5 | 60 |
| Discoverability | 67.8 | 61.2 | +6.6 | 60 |
| Contract Governance | 10.4 | 6.4 | +4 | 60 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 26% | 10% | +16 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 29% | 13% | +16 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 40% | 11% | +29 |
| Security | 97% | 96% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 13% | 2% | +11 |
| Governance rules | 32% | 14% | +18 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Adobe Suite 75.6
- 2 Lev 67.9
- 3 Microsoft Graph 64.1
- 4 Docusign 64
- 5 Coda Project 62.8
- 6 Box 60.2
- 7 Microsoft Word 58.5
- 8 Filevine 57.5
- 9 GoNitro 56.9
- 10 Dropbox Sign (HelloSign) 56.6
- 1 Adobe Suite 62.3
- 2 Lev 54.5
- 3 Coda Project 53.3
- 4 Box 52.1
- 5 Loopio 47.9
- 6 Dropbox Sign (HelloSign) 44.8
- 7 Qwilr 44.6
- 8 Outline 44.2
- 9 Abound 41.5
- 10 Microsoft Word 39.9
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.