Markets · bedrock market · provisional
Legal and E-Signature
Regulated market (eidas trusted lists) plus platform app stores. The Kin Score Market layer reads each provider in its market:
who it integrates with, how deep those integrations go, and where the market publishes its own structure.
Methodology.
25providers measured
7 (28.0%)declare their own
2 (8.0%)covered by others only
1 (4.0%)distribution only (sell through, not integrations)
15 (60.0%)undeclared
0in-market workflows shown
Provisional. Provisional and unweighted: the Market layer is not part of the composite or agent readiness. Leader lists are read within a position, never as one ranking. A provider that declares nothing we can
read is shown as undeclared, with no number: we never infer integrations.
Where this market publishes its structure
- EU List of Trusted Lists (eIDAS qualified trust service providers, 30 national lists) machine-readable
- DocuSign integrations directory (docusign.com/integrations) machine-readable, rendered tiles only
- DocuSign App Center not machine-readable: account-scoped API
- Ironclad integrations machine-readable, names only
- Clio App Directory not machine-readable: 403
- Adobe Acrobat Sign integrations not machine-readable: 403
- Dropbox Sign integrations not machine-readable: names only
- Swiss ZertES list not machine-readable: outside the EU LOTL
Own = declares at least one integration itself; covered = visible only because an aggregator, standards body, regulator or partner contract names it; distribution-only = listed only on cloud marketplaces it sells through, a channel reported beside, never counted as its own declared integrations; undeclared = nothing we can read, so no number; declares_compatibility = providers with a `compatible` shape vote, report only (kin, 2026-10-13): never counted as own, never in depth or position.
Taxonomy how this market maps onto apis.io
Derived 2026-10-15 from the 25 providers in this market we could resolve in the
catalog. The percentage is the share of those providers carrying each one; it describes the market, not the tag or industry. Tag groups have no page of their own yet, so they are listed unlinked.
| Tags | E-Signature 68%, Legal 36%, Compliance 28%, Document Management 28%, Legal Tech 24%, Documents 24%, Contract Lifecycle Management 24%, Workflows 20%, Contract Management 20% |
|---|
| Tag groups | Documents 88%, Legal Tech 48%, Contract Management 32%, Security 28%, Workflows 20%, Digital Identity 20% |
|---|
| Industries | Legal & Compliance Tech 100%, Cybersecurity & Identity 32%, Accounting & Finance Operations 20% |
|---|
| Areas | Workflow Automation 12%, Authentication 12% |
|---|
| Capabilities | Developer Platform & API Ecosystem Management 44%, Legal Management 40%, Cybersecurity Management 20% |
|---|
share of resolved cohort carrying it; tags >=0.20 & >=3 members (max 12, junk dropped), tag_groups >=0.20 (cooccurrence, non-cross-cutting; max 8), industries >=0.20 (max 6), areas >=0.10 (max 6; areas are keyword-matched and sparse), capabilities L1 >=0.20 (max 8); derive-market-taxonomy.py
Leaders by position (provisional)
Provisional: grouped by position, depth compared within a position only. Distribution (cloud marketplaces) and iPaaS bridges are counted beside
position, never inside it. Unknown-builder listings are left out of position shares and counted here.
builds-on 4 · publishes apps on other platforms' stores
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|
| PandaDoc |
34.5 thin |
2 |
0 / 2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
builds-on-platform 100% |
| LawVu |
26.8 thin |
2 |
0 / 2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
builds-on-platform 50%, distribution 50% |
| Clio |
17.2 thin |
1 |
0 / 1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
builds-on-platform 100% |
| SignNow |
17.2 thin |
1 |
0 / 1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
builds-on-platform 100% |
regulated 1 · named in a regulator's register or partners' contracts
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|
| YouSign |
23.9 thin |
1 |
0 / 1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
contract 100% |
standard 2 · listed by a voluntary standard's own directory
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|
| LexisNexis |
34.5 thin |
2 |
0 / 2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
standard 50%, builds-on-platform 50% |
| Thomson Reuters |
17.2 thin |
1 |
0 / 1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
standard 100% |
core 1 · builds the connectors its customers need
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|
| Docusign |
53.7 |
65 |
20 / 45 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
partner-built 36%, provider-built 56%, contract 1%, standard 1%, builds-on-platform 4%, distribution 1% |
long-tail 1 · reached only through iPaaS bridges
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|
| Lawmatics |
5.2 |
31 |
0 / 31 |
0 |
0 |
30 |
ipaas-bridge 100% |
distribution 1 · only sells through cloud marketplaces
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|
| Agiloft |
9.6 thin |
1 |
0 / 1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
distribution 100% |
undeclared 15 · declares nothing we can read: no number