Legal
Legallegal
Providers using this tag (149)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Developing 27 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 27 Limited public surface area
Emerging 56 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 34 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 2 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (51)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 12 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 13 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 16 Limited public surface area
Emerging 8 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (21)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Legal” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 141 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Legal, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 31.9 | 26.5 | +5.4 | 141 |
| Contract Quality | 20.1 | 19.8 | +0.3 | 141 |
| Contract Governance | 6.7 | 6.4 | +0.3 | 141 |
| Discoverability | 60.9 | 61.2 | -0.3 | 141 |
| Operational Transparency | 13.2 | 13.9 | -0.7 | 141 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 19.7 | 23.4 | -3.7 | 141 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 6% | 10% | -4 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 18% | 13% | +5 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 8% | 11% | -3 |
| Security | 99% | 96% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 10% | 14% | -4 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Filevine 57.5
- 2 LawVu 57
- 3 LeanLaw 57
- 4 Lawmatics 52.7
- 5 Confido Legal 52.2
- 6 GC AI 51.4
- 7 Laurel 49.7
- 8 Kodex 49.4
- 9 Agiloft 49.1
- 10 SingleFile 49.1
- 1 GC AI 58.8
- 2 LawVu 49.3
- 3 Trellis Research 44.6
- 4 LeanLaw 42.3
- 5 Lawmatics 42.2
- 6 USPTO Trademark Search API 38.8
- 7 Confido Legal 37.1
- 8 OpenLaws 35.8
- 9 Actionstep 33.8
- 10 CourtListener 32.9
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.