Contracts
Providers using this tag (40)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 14 Limited public surface area
Emerging 11 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (136)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 13 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 14 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 59 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 41 Limited public surface area
Emerging 8 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (106)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Contracts” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 106 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 40 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Contracts, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 36.1 | 20.1 | +16 | 40 |
| Operational Transparency | 25.1 | 14 | +11.1 | 40 |
| Access Clarity | 37 | 26.5 | +10.5 | 40 |
| Discoverability | 67.2 | 61 | +6.2 | 40 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 28.4 | 23.4 | +5 | 40 |
| Contract Governance | 9.1 | 6.5 | +2.6 | 40 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 13% | 10% | +3 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 28% | 13% | +15 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 20% | 11% | +9 |
| Security | 100% | 96% | +4 |
| Arazzo workflows | 5% | 2% | +3 |
| Governance rules | 25% | 13% | +12 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Docusign 64.1
- 2 Ironclad 57
- 3 GC AI 51.4
- 4 SpotDraft 50.7
- 5 Qwilr 48.9
- 6 Docparser 48.6
- 7 Common Paper 44.4
- 8 Scout RFP (Workday Strategic Sourcing) 43.7
- 9 Juro 43.6
- 10 Luminance 43.4
- 1 GC AI 58.8
- 2 Upwork 55.4
- 3 Common Paper 51.1
- 4 Qwilr 44.6
- 5 HoneyBook 44.6
- 6 Concord 44.6
- 7 Docusign 35.2
- 8 Ironclad 34.5
- 9 Ariba Sourcing 33.5
- 10 Contractbook 32.4
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.