Law Firms
Law FirmLaw Firms
Providers using this tag (32)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 2 Limited public surface area
Emerging 11 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 14 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (1)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Thin 1 Limited public surface area
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 30 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Law Firms, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 29.7 | 26.5 | +3.2 | 30 |
| Contract Governance | 6.7 | 6.3 | +0.4 | 30 |
| Discoverability | 56.4 | 58.1 | -1.7 | 30 |
| Operational Transparency | 10.7 | 13.7 | -3 | 30 |
| Contract Quality | 12.1 | 17.6 | -5.5 | 30 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 12.3 | 23.2 | -10.9 | 30 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 23% | 14% | +9 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 23% | 12% | +11 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 7% | 11% | -4 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 10% | 14% | -4 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Lawmatics 55.9
- 2 LeanLaw 54.1
- 3 Clio 53.3
- 4 Actionstep 51.3
- 5 Smokeball 42.5
- 6 MyCase 38.5
- 7 Lex Machina 29.9
- 8 Harvey 22.2
- 9 Spellbook 21.1
- 10 Litify 18.4
- 1 Actionstep 50
- 2 Lex Machina 47.1
- 3 LeanLaw 42.3
- 4 Lawmatics 40
- 5 Clio 29.9
- 6 Smokeball 29.8
- 7 MyCase 17.3
- 8 Case Status 8.6
- 9 Pointone 8.6
- 10 General Legal 8.6
Coverage caveat. 26 of 30 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.