Digital Twin
Providers using this tag (43)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 6 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Emerging 17 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 12 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (7)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 2 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (3)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Digital Twin” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 41 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Digital Twin, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 29.3 | 26.5 | +2.8 | 41 |
| Contract Governance | 7.7 | 6.4 | +1.3 | 41 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 21.9 | 23.4 | -1.5 | 41 |
| Discoverability | 59.5 | 61.2 | -1.7 | 41 |
| Operational Transparency | 11.5 | 14 | -2.5 | 41 |
| Contract Quality | 17.2 | 19.8 | -2.6 | 41 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 0% | 10% | -10 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 10% | 13% | -3 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 17% | 11% | +6 |
| Security | 100% | 97% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 17% | 14% | +3 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Cumulocity 64.4
- 2 Bentley Systems 62.7
- 3 Amazon IoT TwinMaker 55.2
- 4 Amazon SimSpace Weaver 49.8
- 5 Siemens MindSphere 43.1
- 6 Cosmo Tech 41.6
- 7 PassiveLogic 40.8
- 8 Cintoo 40.1
- 9 Cognite 39.9
- 10 MatterPort 37.4
- 1 PassiveLogic 37.2
- 2 Amazon SimSpace Weaver 37.1
- 3 Cintoo 35.8
- 4 Cosmo Tech 31.1
- 5 Cognite 29.4
- 6 Siemens 28.4
- 7 Amazon IoT TwinMaker 28.1
- 8 Siemens MindSphere 28.1
- 9 Sight Machine 25.2
- 10 Bentley Systems 24.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.