Digital Twin
Digital Twindigital-twin
Providers using this tag (40)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 10 Limited public surface area
Emerging 13 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 11 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (6)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 1 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 40 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Digital Twin, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 30.3 | 22.3 | +8 | 40 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 19.5 | 17.9 | +1.6 | 40 |
| Contract Quality | 18.8 | 17.5 | +1.3 | 40 |
| Contract Governance | 7.6 | 6.4 | +1.2 | 40 |
| Operational Transparency | 11.3 | 11.3 | 0 | 40 |
| Discoverability | 59.2 | 60.4 | -1.2 | 40 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 5% | 16% | -11 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 0% | 7% | -7 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 15% | 9% | +6 |
| Security | 95% | 88% | +7 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 23% | 13% | +10 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Bentley Systems 64.1
- 2 Cumulocity 63.2
- 3 Amazon IoT TwinMaker 49.9
- 4 Amazon SimSpace Weaver 47.3
- 5 Cosmo Tech 41.9
- 6 PassiveLogic 41.3
- 7 Eaton 39.2
- 8 Cintoo 39
- 9 Siemens MindSphere 38.3
- 10 MatterPort 37.4
- 1 PassiveLogic 37.2
- 2 Amazon SimSpace Weaver 37.1
- 3 Cintoo 35.8
- 4 Cosmo Tech 31.1
- 5 Cognite 29.4
- 6 Amazon IoT TwinMaker 28.1
- 7 Siemens MindSphere 28.1
- 8 Bentley Systems 24.8
- 9 Eaton 22.7
- 10 Cumulocity 22.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/digital-twin"curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/digital-twin"curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/digital-twin/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.