Providers using this tag (60)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 8 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 14 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 22 Limited public surface area
Emerging 12 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 4 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (32)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 6 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 7 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 10 Limited public surface area
Emerging 8 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 60 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged CDN, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 41.2 | 17.5 | +23.7 | 60 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 33.5 | 17.9 | +15.6 | 60 |
| Operational Transparency | 25.6 | 11.3 | +14.3 | 60 |
| Access Clarity | 36.4 | 22.3 | +14.1 | 60 |
| Discoverability | 70.4 | 60.4 | +10 | 60 |
| Contract Governance | 8.4 | 6.4 | +2 | 60 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 20% | 16% | +4 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 8% | 7% | +1 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 22% | 9% | +13 |
| Security | 97% | 88% | +9 |
| Arazzo workflows | 7% | 2% | +5 |
| Governance rules | 28% | 13% | +15 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Brand API (Brandfetch) 66.4
- 2 IBM 62.6
- 3 Cloudflare 62
- 4 Fastly 60.8
- 5 Datadog 57.1
- 6 ezoic 56.1
- 7 Amazon CloudFront 55.3
- 8 Netlify 54.3
- 9 Amazon Global Accelerator 50.7
- 10 ImageKit 49.1
- 1 Brand API (Brandfetch) 52.4
- 2 ezoic 48.2
- 3 Cloudflare 44.5
- 4 IBM 39.4
- 5 Datadog 38.3
- 6 Akamai 36.3
- 7 Builder.io 35.4
- 8 EVE Online 34.9
- 9 QuantCDN 32.3
- 10 ImageKit 31.7
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/cdn"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/cdn"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/cdn/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.