emerging · -1.4 market domain

Content Delivery

Score 20.8 / 100 26 providers +13 via APIs 23 APIs Search apis.io →

Providers using this tag (26)

Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.

Exemplar 5 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 8 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 2 Limited public surface area
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 7 Almost no public developer surface

APIs with this tag (23)

Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →

Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 8 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 6 Limited public surface area
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface

Companies reaching this through an API (13)

These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Content Delivery” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.

7digital Adobe Captivate ASTM International Bloomreach Hygraph Kontent AI Orange Business PECO Energy Pruna AI Salesforce Experience Cloud Sitecore Stanford University The Co-operative Bank

Score breakdown

Frequency
46.9
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
0.6
spread across providers
Quality lift
38.7
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
7.9
strength of nearest seed neighbor

Related tags

Headless CMS 11 co-occurrences Digital Experience 6 co-occurrences CDN 8 co-occurrences Content Management 12 co-occurrences CMS 6 co-occurrences Personalization 5 co-occurrences Environment 5 co-occurrences Content 7 co-occurrences

Where this tag comes from

Api tag23
Provider tag26
Openapi tag5
Openapi op tag21

Cohort brief

Auto-generated

The 21 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Content Delivery, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.

Providers
21
of 26 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
45.6
+23.4 vs catalog 22.2
Mean Agent Readiness
27.6
+15.6 vs catalog 12
Spread
4.4–73.6
median 49.6 · σ 20.4
How the 21 split by band
Exemplar 5Strong 2Developing 8Thin 2Emerging 2Minimal 2
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
FacetThis cohortCatalogDifferenceScored
Operational Transparency 39.2 13 +26.2 21
Contract Quality 43.3 17.2 +26.1 21
Developer Ergonomics 49.3 23.2 +26.1 21
Access Clarity 46.4 23.9 +22.5 21
Discoverability 70 57.9 +12.1 21
Contract Governance 13.5 6.5 +7 21

A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.

What this cohort publishes
ArtifactThis cohortCatalogDifference
MCP server (any) 43% 13% +30
MCP server (first-party) 43% 12% +31
Agent Skills 0% 0% 0
OAuth scopes 33% 11% +22
Security 100% 98% +2
Arazzo workflows 5% 2% +3
Governance rules 33% 16% +17

mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.

Top by Kin Score
  1. 1 Contentstack 73.6
  2. 2 Microsoft Azure Cdn 71.3
  3. 3 Prismic 71.2
  4. 4 dotCMS 70.9
  5. 5 CloudFront 67.3
  6. 6 Contensis 58.7
  7. 7 Google Cloud CDN 54.7
  8. 8 Vertesia 54.1
  9. 9 Ceros 52.9
  10. 10 Signiant 49.7
Top by Agent Readiness
  1. 1 Builder.io 64.4
  2. 2 Prismic 53.6
  3. 3 dotCMS 45.2
  4. 4 Vertesia 38.6
  5. 5 Contensis 37.5
  6. 6 Microsoft Azure Cdn 35.9
  7. 7 Restream 35.3
  8. 8 echo3D 32
  9. 9 Storyblok 31.3
  10. 10 Kortext 29.4
All 26 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the catalog; 21 carry a score (81%). The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 13 of 21 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.

Work with this as data

Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for tags

7 MCP tools reach this
  • find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.
  • get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.
  • cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.
  • cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.
  • apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
  • resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
  • find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page
This tag
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/content-delivery"
All tags
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
As a scored cohort
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/content-delivery"
The distribution (Pro)
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/content-delivery/stats" \
  -H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"

Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.

Get an API key

Free tier, no form to fill in. Signing in shares your email address with us — we store it to create your key and to recognise you if you sign in with another provider. See our Privacy Policy and Terms.

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.