Environment
EnvironmentsEnvironment
Providers using this tag (42)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 10 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 22 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (183)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 42 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 33 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 57 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 23 Limited public surface area
Emerging 10 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 18 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (142)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Environment” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 142 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 39 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Environment, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 20.8 | 17.6 | +3.2 | 39 |
| Contract Governance | 7.6 | 6.3 | +1.3 | 39 |
| Discoverability | 58.5 | 58.1 | +0.4 | 39 |
| Operational Transparency | 12.4 | 13.7 | -1.3 | 39 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 20.2 | 23.2 | -3 | 39 |
| Access Clarity | 20.7 | 26.5 | -5.8 | 39 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 8% | 14% | -6 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 8% | 12% | -4 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 3% | 11% | -8 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 5% | 2% | +3 |
| Governance rules | 28% | 14% | +14 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Postman 79.6
- 2 First Street 56.5
- 3 Prime Intellect 55
- 4 Google Maps Platform 50.9
- 5 Climatiq 45.8
- 6 Bureau of Land Management 41.9
- 7 Carbon Intensity API 37.7
- 8 World Air Quality Index (WAQI) 37.6
- 9 Eurostat 36.2
- 10 Forest Service 34.5
- 1 Postman 54.9
- 2 Bureau of Land Management 39.8
- 3 World Air Quality Index (WAQI) 35.4
- 4 First Street 35.1
- 5 Prime Intellect 33.7
- 6 Air Quality Programmatic APIs 28.7
- 7 Google Maps Platform 27.3
- 8 Pantheon 26.6
- 9 SouthendOnSea.city 24.2
- 10 Carbon Intensity API 22.9
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.