Environment
Environmentenvironment
Providers using this tag (41)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 8 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 23 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (72)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 7 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 31 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 8 Limited public surface area
Emerging 10 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 15 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (28)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Environment” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 38 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Environment, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discoverability | 62.3 | 61.2 | +1.1 | 38 |
| Contract Governance | 6.5 | 6.4 | +0.1 | 38 |
| Contract Quality | 18.6 | 19.8 | -1.2 | 38 |
| Operational Transparency | 9.9 | 14 | -4.1 | 38 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 16.6 | 23.4 | -6.8 | 38 |
| Access Clarity | 17.7 | 26.5 | -8.8 | 38 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 3% | 10% | -7 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 3% | 13% | -10 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 3% | 11% | -8 |
| Security | 100% | 97% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 24% | 14% | +10 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 First Street 59.1
- 2 Google Maps Platform 51.1
- 3 Climatiq 48.3
- 4 Bureau of Land Management 46.5
- 5 World Air Quality Index (WAQI) 40.9
- 6 Carbon Intensity API 40.8
- 7 Forest Service 37.4
- 8 Eurostat 37.2
- 9 SouthendOnSea.city 35
- 10 Air Quality Programmatic APIs 34.8
- 1 Bureau of Land Management 42.7
- 2 World Air Quality Index (WAQI) 35.4
- 3 First Street 35.1
- 4 Google Maps Platform 29.4
- 5 Air Quality Programmatic APIs 28.7
- 6 SouthendOnSea.city 26.7
- 7 Carbon Intensity API 22.9
- 8 Eurostat 22.9
- 9 Danish Meteorological Institutes 22.9
- 10 FAO FAOSTAT 22.9
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.