established · 0.7 capability resource

Feature Flags

Score 26.3 / 100 26 providers +27 via APIs 48 APIs Search apis.io →
Workflows using this tag
Jira Create an Issue and Read It Back · Jira Jira Bootstrap Issue Creation Metadata · Jira Jira Transition an Issue to a New Status · Jira Jira Sweep a Stale Issue Through a Transition · Jira Jira Run a JQL Report and Drill Into a Result · Jira Jira Read an Issue Comment Thread and Reply · Jira Jira Safely Delete an Issue · Jira Jira Discover a Project and Its Workflow Statuses · Jira
Business capabilities this tag reaches
Software Release & Deployment Management 19

Providers using this tag (26)

Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.

Exemplar 6 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 9 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 7 Limited public surface area
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented

APIs with this tag (47)

Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →

Exemplar 13 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Harness Feature Flags APIAPIs to create and manage Feature Flags93.0Harness Feature Management and Experimentation APIAPIs to create and manage feature flags, targets, target groups, and tags for feature release management, p...93.0Kinde Feature flags APIThe Feature flags API from Kinde — 3 operation(s) for feature flags.88.5launchdarkly Feature Flags APICreate, update, and manage feature flags and their targeting rules across projects and environments.80.8LaunchDarkly MCP ServerLaunchDarkly operates a first-party hosted Model Context Protocol server at https://mcp.launchdarkly.com/mc...80.8Flagsmith Flags APIThe Flagsmith Flags API is the public-facing REST API that client-side and server-side SDKs use to retrieve...78.5Atlassian Jira Software Feature Flags APIThe Atlassian Jira Software Feature Flags API enables sending feature flag information to Jira Software for...77.5Swetrix Feature Flags APIFeature flag evaluation statistics77.0Jira Feature Flags APIAPIs related to integrating feature flags with Jira Software. These APIs are available to Atlassian Connect...76.8CloudBees Feature Management REST APIThe CloudBees Feature Management REST API (formerly Rollout) provides programmatic access to applications, ...74.0Canvas Feature Flags APIThe Feature Flags API from Canvas — 10 operation(s) for feature flags.70.3Edge Impulse Feature Flags APIThe Feature Flags API from Edge Impulse — 1 operation(s) for feature flags.69.4Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Feature Flags APIThe feature_flags API from Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform — 8 operation(s) for feature_flags.66.5
Strong 11 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented

Companies reaching this through an API (27)

These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Feature Flags” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.

Atlassian Canvas CleverTap Cloud Foundry Crusoe Edge Impulse Forta Health Frontegg GitLab CI/CD Google Firebase Harness Hatchet Heroic Labs Jira Maia-analytics Medusa Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Saxo Bank Smart Pension Software Development Lifecycle Swetrix The San Francisco Compute Company Tower Validere WorkOS WunderGraph Zoca

Score breakdown

Frequency
55.3
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
0.7
spread across providers
Quality lift
61.4
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
0.0
strength of nearest seed neighbor

Where this tag sits

Feature Management 11 providers

Related tags

Experimentation 21 co-occurrences Feature Management 12 co-occurrences A/B Testing 16 co-occurrences Experiments 11 co-occurrences Features 9 co-occurrences Environment 14 co-occurrences Releases 6 co-occurrences

Where this tag comes from

Provider tag26
Api tag48
Openapi tag23
Openapi op tag80

Cohort brief

Auto-generated

The 26 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Feature Flags, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.

Providers
26
all scored
Mean Kin Score
49.9
+27.0 vs catalog 22.9
Mean Agent Readiness
38.2
+26.3 vs catalog 11.9
Spread
25.3–87.5
median 47.3 · σ 18.9
How the 26 split by band
Exemplar 6Strong 2Developing 9Thin 7Emerging 2Minimal 0
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
FacetThis cohortCatalogDifferenceScored
Contract Quality 54.9 17.6 +37.3 26
Developer Ergonomics 51.6 23.2 +28.4 26
Operational Transparency 37 13.7 +23.3 26
Access Clarity 45.8 26.5 +19.3 26
Contract Governance 19.7 6.3 +13.4 26
Discoverability 68.6 58.1 +10.5 26

A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.

What this cohort publishes
ArtifactThis cohortCatalogDifference
MCP server (any) 65% 14% +51
MCP server (first-party) 65% 12% +53
Agent Skills 0% 0% 0
OAuth scopes 27% 11% +16
Security 100% 98% +2
Arazzo workflows 12% 2% +10
Governance rules 58% 14% +44

mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.

Top by Kin Score
  1. 1 Kinde 87.5
  2. 2 LaunchDarkly 80.8
  3. 3 Optimizely 80.8
  4. 4 Flagsmith 78.5
  5. 5 Statsig 76.7
  6. 6 CloudBees 72.8
  7. 7 DevCycle 60.1
  8. 8 Amplitude 57.3
  9. 9 Bucket 53.9
  10. 10 Featureflip 51.7
Top by Agent Readiness
  1. 1 Optimizely 62.5
  2. 2 Statsig 57.1
  3. 3 DevCycle 56.8
  4. 4 PostHog 55.7
  5. 5 Schematic 55.3
  6. 6 Amplitude 54
  7. 7 LaunchDarkly 51.9
  8. 8 Bucket 48.7
  9. 9 Kinde 48.1
  10. 10 Flagsmith 47.2
All 26 members of this roster resolve to a scored provider in the catalog.
Coverage caveat. 13 of 26 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.

Work with this as data

Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for tags

7 MCP tools reach this
  • find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.
  • get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.
  • cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.
  • cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.
  • apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
  • resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
  • find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page
This tag
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/feature-flags"
All tags
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
As a scored cohort
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/feature-flags"
The distribution (Pro)
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/feature-flags/stats" \
  -H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"

Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.

Get an API key

Free tier, no form to fill in. Signing in shares your email address with us — we store it to create your key and to recognise you if you sign in with another provider. See our Privacy Policy and Terms.

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.