Connectors
Connectorsconnectors
Providers using this tag (36)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 5 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Emerging 8 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 4 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (107)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 14 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 19 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 35 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 30 Limited public surface area
Emerging 9 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (83)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Connectors” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 83 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 36 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Connectors, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operational Transparency | 33.9 | 13.9 | +20 | 36 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 41.9 | 23.4 | +18.5 | 36 |
| Access Clarity | 44.8 | 26.5 | +18.3 | 36 |
| Contract Quality | 30.5 | 19.8 | +10.7 | 36 |
| Contract Governance | 12.8 | 6.4 | +6.4 | 36 |
| Discoverability | 67.5 | 61.2 | +6.3 | 36 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 36% | 10% | +26 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 39% | 13% | +26 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 22% | 11% | +11 |
| Security | 100% | 96% | +4 |
| Arazzo workflows | 6% | 2% | +4 |
| Governance rules | 28% | 14% | +14 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Tray.ai 87.1
- 2 Confluent 79
- 3 Confluent | the Data Streaming Platform 72.9
- 4 Jitterbit 70.1
- 5 Airbyte 67.4
- 6 IntegrationOS 64.9
- 7 Nexla 64.1
- 8 Prismatic 63
- 9 Integration.app (Membrane) 61
- 10 CI HUB 60.2
- 1 Tray.ai 57.9
- 2 Integration.app (Membrane) 57.7
- 3 IntegrationOS 54
- 4 CI HUB 52
- 5 Confluent 49.4
- 6 Confluent | the Data Streaming Platform 49.4
- 7 Airbyte 45.6
- 8 Nexla 43.1
- 9 Prismatic 37.1
- 10 Skyvia 36.4
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.