Markets · bedrock market · provisional

Red Hat Certified Ecosystem (certified partner containers + certified OpenShift operators)

Platform certification market (red hat container certification, openshift operator certification). The Kin Score Market layer reads each provider in its market: who it integrates with, how deep those integrations go, and where the market publishes its own structure. Methodology.

139providers measured
100 (71.9%)declare their own
34 (24.5%)covered by others only
1 (0.7%)distribution only (sell through, not integrations)
4 (2.9%)undeclared
33declare compatibility (report only, not weighted)
5in-market workflows shown
Provisional. Provisional and unweighted: the Market layer is not part of the composite or agent readiness. Leader lists are read within a position, never as one ranking. A provider that declares nothing we can read is shown as undeclared, with no number: we never infer integrations.

Where this market publishes its structure

Own = declares at least one integration itself; covered = visible only because an aggregator, standards body, regulator or partner contract names it; distribution-only = listed only on cloud marketplaces it sells through, a channel reported beside, never counted as its own declared integrations; undeclared = nothing we can read, so no number; declares_compatibility = providers with a `compatible` shape vote, report only (kin, 2026-10-13): never counted as own, never in depth or position.

Taxonomy how this market maps onto apis.io

Derived 2026-10-23 from the 139 providers in this market we could resolve in the catalog. The percentage is the share of those providers carrying each one; it describes the market, not the tag or industry. Tag groups have no page of their own yet, so they are listed unlinked.

TagsKubernetes 23%
Tag groupsKubernetes 27%, Security 23%, Infrastructure 22%
IndustriesDeveloper Tools & DevOps 62%, Data & Analytics 29%, Cybersecurity & Identity 29%, Artificial Intelligence 22%
AreasSecurity 17%, Observability 15%, Database 14%, Monitoring 12%
CapabilitiesCybersecurity Management 40%, Information Technology Management 27%

share of resolved cohort carrying it; tags >=0.20 & >=3 members (max 12, junk dropped), tag_groups >=0.20 (cooccurrence, non-cross-cutting; max 8), industries >=0.20 (max 6), areas >=0.10 (max 6; areas are keyword-matched and sparse), capabilities L1 >=0.20 (max 8); derive-market-taxonomy.py

Leaders by position (provisional)

Provisional: grouped by position, depth compared within a position only. Distribution (cloud marketplaces) and iPaaS bridges are counted beside position, never inside it. Unknown-builder listings are left out of position shares and counted here.

gravity 6 · other companies invest to build on it

ProviderDepthIntegrationsIn / outUnknown builderDistributioniPaaS bridgeMix
Cisco 68.5 161 125 / 36 0 0 0 partner-built 85%, contract 1%, standard 9%, builds-on-platform 5%
Splunk 62.0 1893 1316 / 577 396 1 10 partner-built 70%, provider-built 8%, ipaas-bridge 1%, unknown 21%
CrowdStrike 58.8 401 236 / 165 1 3 1 partner-built 68%, provider-built 28%, standard 2%, builds-on-platform 2%, distribution 1%
Kong 56.2 39 11 / 28 0 0 0 partner-built 41%, standard 37%, builds-on-platform 22%
Ansible 53.7 114 108 / 6 0 0 0 partner-built 95%, standard 3%, builds-on-platform 3%
Grafana 52.9 340 187 / 153 0 3 3 partner-built 62%, provider-built 32%, ipaas-bridge 1%, standard 2%, builds-on-platform 2%, distribution 1%

builds-on 28 · publishes apps on other platforms' stores

ProviderDepthIntegrationsIn / outUnknown builderDistributioniPaaS bridgeMix
Dynatrace 58.7 33 0 / 33 0 8 0 contract 6%, standard 24%, builds-on-platform 45%, distribution 24%
Sumo Logic 55.7 23 0 / 23 0 3 1 ipaas-bridge 4%, contract 9%, standard 30%, builds-on-platform 43%, distribution 13%
Tufin 54.9 5 0 / 5 0 0 0 standard 40%, builds-on-platform 60%
Planetscale 54.7 18 0 / 18 1 2 0 standard 33%, covered 6%, builds-on-platform 44%, distribution 11%, unknown 6%
Anodot 54.6 4 0 / 4 0 0 0 standard 25%, covered 25%, builds-on-platform 50%
Couchbase 54.6 17 0 / 17 0 5 1 ipaas-bridge 6%, standard 18%, covered 6%, builds-on-platform 41%, distribution 29%
Sysdig 54.6 17 0 / 17 0 1 0 standard 35%, builds-on-platform 59%, distribution 6%
Harness 54.3 23 0 / 23 0 4 2 ipaas-bridge 9%, standard 26%, builds-on-platform 48%, distribution 17%
Humanitec 54.1 4 0 / 4 0 0 0 standard 25%, builds-on-platform 75%
Confluent 53.7 16 0 / 16 0 4 1 ipaas-bridge 6%, standard 31%, builds-on-platform 38%, distribution 25%
Sonatype 53.7 13 0 / 13 0 0 0 standard 46%, builds-on-platform 54%
Coralogix 53.5 12 0 / 12 0 3 0 standard 23%, builds-on-platform 54%, distribution 23%
Checkmarx 53.3 13 0 / 13 0 1 0 standard 43%, builds-on-platform 50%, distribution 7%
Contrast Security 53.3 15 0 / 15 0 2 1 ipaas-bridge 7%, standard 27%, builds-on-platform 53%, distribution 13%
Akeyless 53.2 15 0 / 15 0 2 1 ipaas-bridge 7%, standard 27%, builds-on-platform 53%, distribution 13%
VictoriaMetrics 52.9 8 0 / 8 0 0 0 standard 25%, builds-on-platform 75%
DataStax 52.7 13 0 / 13 0 2 0 standard 23%, covered 15%, builds-on-platform 46%, distribution 15%
JFrog 52.7 20 0 / 20 0 1 0 standard 30%, builds-on-platform 65%, distribution 5%
AppDynamics 52.6 12 0 / 12 0 3 0 contract 8%, standard 25%, builds-on-platform 42%, distribution 25%
Lacework FortiCNAPP 50.4 10 0 / 10 0 1 0 standard 20%, builds-on-platform 70%, distribution 10%
Sematext 48.3 11 0 / 11 0 3 0 standard 27%, builds-on-platform 45%, distribution 27%
StreamNative 46.4 5 0 / 5 0 2 0 standard 20%, builds-on-platform 40%, distribution 40%
AccuKnox 45.5 8 0 / 8 0 3 0 standard 12%, builds-on-platform 50%, distribution 38%
VAST Data 45.5 8 0 / 8 0 3 0 standard 25%, builds-on-platform 38%, distribution 38%
Newgen Software 44.5 5 0 / 5 0 2 0 standard 20%, builds-on-platform 40%, distribution 40%
Fortanix 41.7 10 0 / 10 0 5 0 standard 20%, builds-on-platform 30%, distribution 50%
Kurrent 41.4 8 0 / 8 0 5 0 standard 11%, builds-on-platform 33%, distribution 56%
Red Hat 3scale 17.2 thin 1 0 / 1 0 0 0 builds-on-platform 100%

coverage 1 · reaches banks, carriers, systems or channels (an aggregator)

ProviderDepthIntegrationsIn / outUnknown builderDistributioniPaaS bridgeMix
GitLab 52.7 82 0 / 82 0 0 30 ipaas-bridge 37%, contract 1%, standard 6%, coverage 48%, builds-on-platform 7%

covered 1 · reached mainly through aggregators

ProviderDepthIntegrationsIn / outUnknown builderDistributioniPaaS bridgeMix
Red Hat 57.9 156 0 / 156 0 1 0 contract 1%, standard 8%, covered 82%, builds-on-platform 8%, distribution 1%

standard 78 · listed by a voluntary standard's own directory

ProviderDepthIntegrationsIn / outUnknown builderDistributioniPaaS bridgeMix
Oracle 72.2 41 0 / 41 0 3 4 ipaas-bridge 10%, contract 7%, standard 45%, covered 5%, builds-on-platform 26%, distribution 7%
IBM 70.6 60 0 / 60 0 6 0 contract 6%, standard 49%, builds-on-platform 34%, distribution 11%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise 62.8 25 0 / 25 0 4 0 standard 56%, builds-on-platform 30%, distribution 15%
Nvidia 61.8 23 0 / 23 0 0 0 standard 70%, covered 9%, builds-on-platform 22%
Nutanix 61.7 25 0 / 25 0 2 0 contract 8%, standard 56%, builds-on-platform 28%, distribution 8%
Datacore 61.3 3 0 / 3 0 0 0 standard 100%
Thales 59.2 9 0 / 9 0 0 0 standard 78%, builds-on-platform 22%
Gluu 58.9 4 0 / 4 0 0 0 standard 75%, builds-on-platform 25%
Portworx 58.9 4 0 / 4 0 0 0 standard 75%, builds-on-platform 25%
Traefik Labs 58.2 6 0 / 6 0 0 0 standard 83%, builds-on-platform 17%
CSG Systems 58.1 3 0 / 3 0 0 0 standard 67%, builds-on-platform 33%
Advanced Micro Devices 58.0 23 0 / 23 0 3 0 standard 70%, builds-on-platform 17%, distribution 13%
Rafay Product Documentation 57.6 6 0 / 6 0 0 0 standard 67%, builds-on-platform 33%
Juniper Networks 57.3 16 0 / 16 0 1 0 contract 12%, standard 56%, builds-on-platform 25%, distribution 6%
NetApp 56.8 22 0 / 22 0 3 0 contract 9%, standard 45%, builds-on-platform 32%, distribution 14%
Apicurio 56.5 4 0 / 4 0 0 0 standard 75%, builds-on-platform 25%
NeuVector 56.5 4 0 / 4 0 0 0 standard 50%, builds-on-platform 50%
Aqua Security 56.2 14 0 / 14 0 3 0 standard 43%, builds-on-platform 36%, distribution 21%
Citrix 56.1 14 0 / 14 0 1 0 contract 7%, standard 50%, builds-on-platform 36%, distribution 7%
SAS Institute 55.8 13 0 / 13 0 7 0 contract 12%, standard 31%, builds-on-platform 12%, distribution 44%
F5 55.6 19 0 / 19 0 3 0 contract 5%, standard 58%, builds-on-platform 21%, distribution 16%
PerfectScale 54.9 3 0 / 3 0 0 0 standard 67%, builds-on-platform 33%
Rebellions 54.9 3 0 / 3 0 0 0 standard 100%
Seldon 54.1 4 0 / 4 0 0 0 standard 100%
CloudBees 53.7 8 0 / 8 0 0 0 standard 62%, builds-on-platform 38%
Cloudera 53.2 13 0 / 13 0 6 0 contract 7%, standard 36%, builds-on-platform 14%, distribution 43%
Pure Storage 53.1 11 0 / 11 0 2 0 standard 55%, builds-on-platform 27%, distribution 18%
Anchore 52.9 5 0 / 5 0 1 0 standard 60%, builds-on-platform 20%, distribution 20%
Aerospike 52.7 6 0 / 6 0 1 0 standard 67%, builds-on-platform 17%, distribution 17%
Tigera 52.6 7 0 / 7 0 1 0 standard 86%, distribution 14%
EDB 52.3 10 0 / 10 0 1 0 standard 70%, builds-on-platform 20%, distribution 10%
Riverbed Technology 51.3 5 0 / 5 0 1 0 standard 80%, distribution 20%
Hazelcast 50.8 4 0 / 4 0 1 0 standard 75%, distribution 25%
Isovalent 50.8 4 0 / 4 0 1 0 standard 75%, distribution 25%
Infinidat 50.0 5 0 / 5 0 1 0 standard 60%, builds-on-platform 20%, distribution 20%
A10 Networks 49.8 7 0 / 7 0 2 0 standard 50%, builds-on-platform 25%, distribution 25%
XSKY 49.3 4 0 / 4 0 1 0 standard 75%, distribution 25%
Armory 48.4 4 0 / 4 0 1 0 standard 50%, builds-on-platform 25%, distribution 25%
Granulate 47.3 3 0 / 3 0 1 0 standard 67%, distribution 33%
StormForge 47.3 3 0 / 3 0 1 0 standard 67%, distribution 33%
Cockroach Labs 47.2 8 0 / 8 0 2 0 standard 62%, builds-on-platform 12%, distribution 25%
Appian 46.5 7 0 / 7 0 3 0 contract 14%, standard 29%, builds-on-platform 14%, distribution 43%
Sensu 46.5 7 0 / 7 0 2 0 standard 43%, builds-on-platform 29%, distribution 29%
Hammerspace 46.1 7 0 / 7 0 4 0 standard 50%, distribution 50%
Yugabyte 45.8 13 0 / 13 0 6 0 standard 31%, covered 8%, builds-on-platform 15%, distribution 46%
Venafi 45.7 8 0 / 8 0 1 1 ipaas-bridge 12%, standard 38%, builds-on-platform 38%, distribution 12%
InfluxData 44.7 9 0 / 9 0 4 0 standard 56%, distribution 44%
HCLSoftware 44.5 5 0 / 5 0 2 0 standard 40%, builds-on-platform 20%, distribution 40%
Tetrate 44.5 5 0 / 5 0 2 0 standard 60%, distribution 40%
Crunchy Data 43.3 7 0 / 7 0 3 0 standard 29%, builds-on-platform 29%, distribution 43%
H2O.ai 43.3 7 0 / 7 0 3 0 standard 29%, builds-on-platform 29%, distribution 43%
Ab Initio 42.8 3 0 / 3 0 2 0 standard 33%, distribution 67%
ScaleOps 42.6 4 0 / 4 0 2 0 standard 50%, distribution 50%
Red Hat OpenShift 42.5 5 0 / 5 0 2 0 standard 60%, distribution 40%
Mattermost 41.6 11 0 / 11 0 1 3 ipaas-bridge 27%, standard 36%, covered 9%, builds-on-platform 18%, distribution 9%
Densify 39.9 5 0 / 5 0 3 0 standard 40%, distribution 60%
XebiaLabs 39.9 5 0 / 5 0 3 0 standard 20%, builds-on-platform 20%, distribution 60%
Calyptia 39.6 3 0 / 3 0 2 0 standard 33%, distribution 67%
Expanso 39.6 3 0 / 3 0 2 0 standard 33%, distribution 67%
Mavenir 38.3 thin 2 0 / 2 0 0 0 standard 100%
Arrcus 37.7 thin 2 0 / 2 0 0 0 standard 50%, builds-on-platform 50%
Kubecost 37.7 thin 2 0 / 2 0 0 0 standard 100%
Octarine 37.7 thin 2 0 / 2 0 0 0 standard 50%, builds-on-platform 50%
APIMatic 37.5 9 0 / 9 0 7 0 standard 20%, builds-on-platform 10%, distribution 70%
Anjuna 36.9 4 0 / 4 0 3 0 standard 25%, distribution 75%
Quay 34.5 thin 2 0 / 2 0 0 0 standard 100%
Dify 30.4 8 0 / 8 0 4 2 ipaas-bridge 25%, standard 25%, distribution 50%
HeadSpin 30.0 thin 2 0 / 2 0 1 0 standard 50%, distribution 50%
Personetics 30.0 thin 2 0 / 2 0 1 0 standard 50%, distribution 50%
Sapiens International 30.0 thin 2 0 / 2 0 3 0 standard 25%, distribution 75%
Transwarp 23.6 thin 1 0 / 1 0 0 0 standard 100%
Adaptigent 20.4 thin 1 0 / 1 0 0 0 standard 100%
FIWARE 20.4 thin 1 0 / 1 0 0 0 standard 100%
Mobileum 20.4 thin 1 0 / 1 0 0 0 standard 100%
Tejas Networks 20.4 thin 1 0 / 1 0 0 0 standard 100%
UBIX Labs 20.4 thin 1 0 / 1 0 0 0 standard 100%
Zadara 20.4 thin 1 0 / 1 0 0 0 standard 100%
ZaiNar 20.4 thin 1 0 / 1 0 0 0 standard 100%

core 5 · builds the connectors its customers need

ProviderDepthIntegrationsIn / outUnknown builderDistributioniPaaS bridgeMix
Palo Alto Networks 71.7 1162 232 / 930 206 0 0 partner-built 22%, provider-built 60%, standard 1%, builds-on-platform 1%, unknown 16%
New Relic 70.9 786 53 / 733 32 6 4 partner-built 11%, provider-built 80%, standard 1%, builds-on-platform 2%, distribution 1%, unknown 4%
Ping Identity 68.8 1202 89 / 1113 0 0 0 partner-built 31%, provider-built 68%
Datadog 61.6 647 162 / 485 47 3 35 partner-built 24%, provider-built 58%, ipaas-bridge 5%, standard 1%, builds-on-platform 3%, unknown 7%
Elastic 57.0 453 0 / 453 45 1 2 partner-built 6%, provider-built 83%, standard 1%, builds-on-platform 1%, unknown 9%

mixed 15 · no single mode dominates

ProviderDepthIntegrationsIn / outUnknown builderDistributioniPaaS bridgeMix
Microsoft 67.1 58 0 / 58 0 3 7 ipaas-bridge 15%, contract 19%, standard 31%, covered 6%, builds-on-platform 23%, distribution 6%
MongoDB 58.0 28 0 / 28 0 3 5 ipaas-bridge 18%, contract 7%, standard 25%, covered 11%, builds-on-platform 29%, distribution 11%
CyberArk 57.8 17 0 / 17 0 0 0 contract 12%, standard 41%, builds-on-platform 47%
HashiCorp 56.3 13 0 / 13 0 0 0 contract 8%, standard 46%, builds-on-platform 46%
Infoblox 56.2 22 0 / 22 0 2 0 contract 9%, standard 45%, builds-on-platform 36%, distribution 9%
MuleSoft 56.2 8 0 / 8 0 0 0 contract 25%, standard 38%, builds-on-platform 38%
Commvault 55.9 17 0 / 17 0 2 0 contract 6%, standard 41%, builds-on-platform 41%, distribution 12%
Illumio 55.9 17 0 / 17 0 3 0 contract 12%, standard 35%, builds-on-platform 35%, distribution 18%
Wiz 55.5 22 0 / 22 0 3 0 contract 9%, standard 41%, builds-on-platform 36%, distribution 14%
Snyk 55.2 26 0 / 26 0 4 1 ipaas-bridge 4%, contract 7%, standard 37%, builds-on-platform 37%, distribution 15%
Redis 54.6 12 0 / 12 0 0 0 standard 33%, covered 25%, builds-on-platform 42%
BigID 52.3 11 0 / 11 0 2 0 contract 9%, standard 36%, builds-on-platform 36%, distribution 18%
PingCAP 50.3 9 0 / 9 0 1 0 standard 33%, covered 11%, builds-on-platform 44%, distribution 11%
Zabbix 48.8 9 0 / 9 0 1 0 standard 33%, covered 11%, builds-on-platform 44%, distribution 11%
MinIO 38.0 9 0 / 9 1 4 0 standard 22%, covered 11%, builds-on-platform 11%, distribution 44%, unknown 11%

distribution 1 · only sells through cloud marketplaces

ProviderDepthIntegrationsIn / outUnknown builderDistributioniPaaS bridgeMix
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 9.6 thin 1 0 / 1 0 1 0 distribution 100%

undeclared 4 · declares nothing we can read: no number

ProviderDepthIntegrationsIn / outUnknown builderDistributioniPaaS bridgeMix
JBoss undeclared-----
Qumranet undeclared-----
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 undeclared-----
Red Hat Enterprise Linux undeclared-----

Top workflows by market votes

Workflows (Arazzo) and their phrasing are generated by API Evangelist, ranked by market votes (integration edges in the graph, weighted by channel).

In-market workflows only: a step on the market provider's side maps to this market's business capabilities (), and the partner is not a generic export/notify app. Other workflows are counted as bridges (including any whose steps do not resolve to a capability yet). Methodology. In-market: 5; bridges: 0.

WorkflowBetweenVotesWeightedArazzo
Slack
Datadog ↔ Slack 2 1.3 workflow generated by API Evangelist
Slack (own)
Datadog ↔ Slack 2 1.3 workflow generated by API Evangelist
Post new metrics in Datadog for new or updated PagerDuty incidents
Post new metrics in Datadog for new or updated PagerDuty incidents
Datadog ↔ PagerDuty 1 0.4 workflow generated by API Evangelist
Slack
Splunk ↔ Slack 1 0.4 workflow generated by API Evangelist
Slack (own)
Splunk ↔ Slack 1 0.4 workflow generated by API Evangelist

Generated 2026-10-24 from API Evangelist's own files; nothing on this page is a model's judgement. Provisional and unweighted; not part of the Kin Score composite or agent readiness. Read the Market layer methodology. Disagree with an edge? Every edge cites its evidence and can be corrected through the normal correction path.