Providers using this tag (45)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 10 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 4 Limited public surface area
Emerging 18 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 11 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (6)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 1 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 45 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged CAD, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 29.8 | 22.3 | +7.5 | 45 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 24.4 | 17.9 | +6.5 | 45 |
| Operational Transparency | 13.3 | 11.3 | +2 | 45 |
| Discoverability | 62.2 | 60.4 | +1.8 | 45 |
| Contract Quality | 18.4 | 17.5 | +0.9 | 45 |
| Contract Governance | 5.6 | 6.4 | -0.8 | 45 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 16% | 16% | 0 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 7% | 7% | 0 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 20% | 9% | +11 |
| Security | 96% | 88% | +8 |
| Arazzo workflows | 4% | 2% | +2 |
| Governance rules | 18% | 13% | +5 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Bentley Systems 64.1
- 2 Autodesk 60.2
- 3 Onshape 52.9
- 4 Autodesk Construction Cloud 50.3
- 5 Flock Safety 49.4
- 6 Siemens PLM 44.2
- 7 Dassault Systèmes 43.7
- 8 AutoCAD 43.6
- 9 NASA Open APIs 43
- 10 Autodesk Fusion 41.9
- 1 Autodesk 43.2
- 2 Onshape 37.2
- 3 Flock Safety 36.5
- 4 Autodesk Fusion 33.1
- 5 Zamzar 33.1
- 6 Dassault Systèmes 30.6
- 7 Siemens PLM 28.1
- 8 Autodesk Construction Cloud 25.9
- 9 Bentley Systems 24.8
- 10 ptc-thingworx 23
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/cad"curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/cad"curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/cad/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.