Design
Designdesign
Providers using this tag (95)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 12 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 16 Limited public surface area
Emerging 31 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 24 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 5 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (21)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 8 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 6 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (6)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Design” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 85 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Design, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 36.2 | 26.5 | +9.7 | 85 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 26.3 | 23.4 | +2.9 | 85 |
| Operational Transparency | 15.9 | 14 | +1.9 | 85 |
| Discoverability | 61.5 | 61.2 | +0.3 | 85 |
| Contract Governance | 6.4 | 6.4 | 0 | 85 |
| Contract Quality | 17.8 | 19.8 | -2 | 85 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 17% | 10% | +7 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 21% | 13% | +8 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 22% | 11% | +11 |
| Security | 98% | 97% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 6% | 2% | +4 |
| Governance rules | 16% | 14% | +2 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Adobe Suite 75.6
- 2 Canva 67.1
- 3 Figma 57.8
- 4 Savee 56.8
- 5 BudgetPixel 56.7
- 6 TheBrief 55.9
- 7 Autodesk 55.5
- 8 Zeroheight 52.9
- 9 Adobe Creative Cloud 52.8
- 10 Onshape 51
- 1 Adobe Suite 62.3
- 2 Canva 52.2
- 3 Figma 51.1
- 4 Autodesk 44.9
- 5 Savee 41.5
- 6 Zeplin 39.9
- 7 BudgetPixel 39.1
- 8 Onshape 37.2
- 9 Tdaycom 36.3
- 10 Blng 34.3
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.