Creative Tools
Providers using this tag (42)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 9 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Emerging 12 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 13 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (7)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 1 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 3 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (2)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Creative Tools” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 39 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Creative Tools, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 34.6 | 26.5 | +8.1 | 39 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 30.9 | 23.2 | +7.7 | 39 |
| Discoverability | 62.6 | 58.1 | +4.5 | 39 |
| Operational Transparency | 15.8 | 13.7 | +2.1 | 39 |
| Contract Governance | 6.9 | 6.3 | +0.6 | 39 |
| Contract Quality | 18 | 17.6 | +0.4 | 39 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 41% | 14% | +27 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 41% | 12% | +29 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 18% | 11% | +7 |
| Security | 97% | 98% | -1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 8% | 14% | -6 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 CI HUB 61.4
- 2 Bluma 58.5
- 3 BudgetPixel 54.3
- 4 Lightricks 51.8
- 5 Runway 51.7
- 6 FrameThrower 51.1
- 7 SSSNACK 51.1
- 8 Blng 50.7
- 9 Exactly Ai 50.5
- 10 PicsArt (Socialin) 50.3
- 1 Runway 56.4
- 2 BudgetPixel 55.3
- 3 Krea 53.5
- 4 Midjourney 53.2
- 5 CI HUB 52
- 6 Bluma 50.9
- 7 SSSNACK 39.1
- 8 FrameThrower 36.6
- 9 Artlist 33.1
- 10 Lightricks 32.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.