Media
Providers using this tag (576)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 30 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 70 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 94 Limited public surface area
Emerging 140 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 237 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 2 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (186)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 20 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 43 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 44 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 53 Limited public surface area
Emerging 25 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (138)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Media” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 138 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
576 providers carry this tag directly, and 1459 counting the 7 narrower tags below and the 7 beneath them — 883 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 516 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Media, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 18.1 | 17.2 | +0.9 | 516 |
| Access Clarity | 24.8 | 23.9 | +0.9 | 516 |
| Contract Governance | 6.5 | 6.5 | 0 | 516 |
| Discoverability | 57.5 | 57.9 | -0.4 | 516 |
| Operational Transparency | 12.5 | 13 | -0.5 | 516 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 22.6 | 23.2 | -0.6 | 516 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 12% | 13% | -1 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 11% | 12% | -1 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 12% | 11% | +1 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 16% | 16% | 0 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 beehiiv 72.1
- 2 X 69.4
- 3 TranscriptFetch 67.7
- 4 Dolby 65.5
- 5 Bria 64.8
- 6 Red5 63.6
- 7 Frame.io 62.7
- 8 Bynder 61.1
- 9 Vyond 60.4
- 10 MediaValet 60.2
- 1 Bria 63.5
- 2 X 61.2
- 3 Comunicate.top API 60.7
- 4 Plex 59.6
- 5 beehiiv 59.5
- 6 Automattic 57.9
- 7 TranscriptFetch 56.9
- 8 Conviva 53.6
- 9 Opus 53.4
- 10 Unified 52.6
Coverage caveat. 462 of 516 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.