Entertainment
Providers using this tag (428)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 14 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 33 Limited public surface area
Emerging 104 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 274 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (21)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 2 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 2 Limited public surface area
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 12 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (5)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Entertainment” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| Film & Media Identifiers (EIDR, ISAN, MovieLabs, DPP) | 47% |
| Broadcast Television (ATSC 3.0 / NEXTGEN TV, HbbTV, DVB) | 34% |
| Events and Ticketing Platforms | 24% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 370 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Entertainment, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 3.7 | 6.5 | -2.8 | 370 |
| Discoverability | 53.2 | 57.9 | -4.7 | 370 |
| Operational Transparency | 5 | 13 | -8 | 370 |
| Access Clarity | 14.9 | 23.9 | -9 | 370 |
| Contract Quality | 7.7 | 17.2 | -9.5 | 370 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 11.6 | 23.2 | -11.6 | 370 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 5% | 13% | -8 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 2% | 12% | -10 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 6% | 11% | -5 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 11% | 16% | -5 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Rockbot 57.7
- 2 Fabric Origin 55.8
- 3 Plex 54.2
- 4 SponsorUnited 53.6
- 5 Twitch 50.5
- 6 TVmaze 50.2
- 7 viagogo 49.4
- 8 The Movie Database 47.7
- 9 AOL 44.6
- 10 Gracenote 43.8
- 1 Plex 59.6
- 2 Fabric Origin 49.8
- 3 Rockbot 41.3
- 4 Gracenote 41.2
- 5 Fnatic 40
- 6 Ron Swanson Quotes 38.3
- 7 AniList 36.6
- 8 Splitgate 36.4
- 9 AOL 36.1
- 10 chucknorris.io 35.5
Coverage caveat. 347 of 370 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.