Broadcast Television (ATSC 3.0 / NEXTGEN TV, HbbTV, DVB)

Where this market publishes its structure

• NEXTGEN TV devices (watchnextgentv.com wp-json/wp/v2/shop + tv_brand + device_type) machine-readable, 14 listings (TV 5, upgrade accessory 3, antenna 6), 9 brands; names only; 1 linked (sony); tv_brand terms inconsistent (TV brand taken from title)
• ATSC members (atsc.org/members/) machine-readable, 141 members with site links; 7 linked; voting / observer class not marked
• HbbTV Association members (hbbtv.org/membership/#members) machine-readable, 60 members; 3 linked
• HbbTV Full Logo Licensees (hbbtv.org/resource-library/#using-logo) machine-readable, 12 licensees as logos only (name from file name); 0 linked
• HbbTV Test Suite licensees (List-of-Test-Suite-Licensees-06-2022.pdf) machine-readable, 45 names, dated June 2022; 1 linked (roku); test labs held
• DVB Project members (dvb.org vtm-members data/members.json) machine-readable, 124 members, all with website; 5 linked
• ATSC 3.0 deployments (atsc.org/nextgen-tv/deployments + watchnextgentv market-city JSON) machine-readable, 87 US markets (81 On Air, 6 Coming Soon), cities only, no station or owner names; one named operator (Television Jamaica), no repo; 0 edges
• A3SA (ATSC 3.0 Security Authority) licensed devices not machine-readable: a3sa.com publishes no device or licensee list
• CTA NEXTGEN TV logo programme test records not machine-readable: not public
• Station-level ATSC 3.0 deployments not machine-readable: watchnextgentv market pages list cities only; rabbitears.info is a hobbyist index, not a register
• DVB / HbbTV member portals not machine-readable: member.dvb.org and member.hbbtv.org are behind login

Own = declares at least one integration itself; covered = visible only because an aggregator, standards body, regulator or partner contract names it; distribution-only = listed only on cloud marketplaces it sells through, a channel reported beside, never counted as its own declared integrations; undeclared = nothing we can read, so no number; declares_compatibility = providers with a `compatible` shape vote, report only (kin, 2026-10-13): never counted as own, never in depth or position.

Taxonomy how this market maps onto apis.io

Derived 2026-10-21 from the 65 providers in this market we could resolve in the catalog. The percentage is the share of those providers carrying each one; it describes the market, not the tag or industry. Tag groups have no page of their own yet, so they are listed unlinked.

share of resolved cohort carrying it; tags >=0.20 & >=3 members (max 12, junk dropped), tag_groups >=0.20 (cooccurrence, non-cross-cutting; max 8), industries >=0.20 (max 6), areas >=0.10 (max 6; areas are keyword-matched and sparse), capabilities L1 >=0.20 (max 8); derive-market-taxonomy.py

Leaders by position (provisional)

Provisional: grouped by position, depth compared within a position only. Distribution (cloud marketplaces) and iPaaS bridges are counted beside position, never inside it. Unknown-builder listings are left out of position shares and counted here.

builds-on 1 · publishes apps on other platforms' stores

covered 1 · reached mainly through aggregators

standard 18 · listed by a voluntary standard's own directory

undeclared 45 · declares nothing we can read: no number