Games
Gamesgames
Providers using this tag (101)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 10 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 10 Limited public surface area
Emerging 18 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 58 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 2 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (32)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 8 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 17 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (17)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Games” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 87 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Games, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discoverability | 59.2 | 61.2 | -2 | 87 |
| Contract Governance | 3.5 | 6.4 | -2.9 | 87 |
| Access Clarity | 21 | 26.5 | -5.5 | 87 |
| Operational Transparency | 8.4 | 14 | -5.6 | 87 |
| Contract Quality | 13.4 | 19.8 | -6.4 | 87 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 16.3 | 23.4 | -7.1 | 87 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 4% | 10% | -6 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 3% | 13% | -10 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 6% | 11% | -5 |
| Security | 98% | 97% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 10% | 14% | -4 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Lichess 55.9
- 2 Fabric Origin 55.8
- 3 API League 54.9
- 4 Convai 52.3
- 5 PlayFab 48.6
- 6 Blizzard Entertainment 47.4
- 7 Epic Games 46.8
- 8 Kongregate 44.1
- 9 The New York Times Company 43.1
- 10 CCP Games 41.9
- 1 Fabric Origin 52.7
- 2 Battle.net 38.8
- 3 Lichess 38.4
- 4 Voidpet 35.4
- 5 YGOPRODeck 30.8
- 6 Kongregate 30.4
- 7 API League 27.3
- 8 CCP Games 27.2
- 9 The New York Times Company 25.8
- 10 Inworld AI 23.7
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.