Games
Providers using this tag (111)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 12 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 15 Limited public surface area
Emerging 33 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 49 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (54)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 13 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 27 Limited public surface area
Emerging 6 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (30)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Games” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 95 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Games, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discoverability | 57.5 | 59.1 | -1.6 | 95 |
| Contract Governance | 7.1 | 9.7 | -2.6 | 95 |
| Contract Quality | 14.6 | 18.6 | -4 | 95 |
| Operational Transparency | 8.3 | 13.2 | -4.9 | 95 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 18.4 | 24.5 | -6.1 | 95 |
| Access Clarity | 20.2 | 30 | -9.8 | 95 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 14% | 18% | -4 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 11% | 16% | -5 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 6% | 13% | -7 |
| Security | 100% | 99% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 1% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 29% | 36% | -7 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Fabric Origin 58.3
- 2 Lichess 55.9
- 3 PlayFab 54.2
- 4 ViewsMeet 53.3
- 5 cybermaxtools-com 50.9
- 6 CCP Games 49.6
- 7 Kongregate 48.8
- 8 SFXMint 47.2
- 9 Epic Games 44.1
- 10 Agent Arcade 41.3
- 1 Fabric Origin 49.8
- 2 cybermaxtools-com 47.4
- 3 AgentWorld 44.6
- 4 ViewsMeet 41.8
- 5 Battle.net 39.1
- 6 Voidpet 38.5
- 7 Lichess 38.4
- 8 liars.town 36.8
- 9 SFXMint 32.7
- 10 whiteclover 31.3
Coverage caveat. 79 of 95 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 14 November 2026, across 41591 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.