Gaming
Providers using this tag (433)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 8 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 37 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 48 Limited public surface area
Emerging 69 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 268 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (48)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 8 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 17 Limited public surface area
Emerging 19 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 4 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (4)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Gaming” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
433 providers carry this tag directly, and 533 counting the 12 narrower tags below — 100 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 362 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Gaming, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 3.5 | 6.3 | -2.8 | 362 |
| Discoverability | 54.7 | 58.1 | -3.4 | 362 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 18.4 | 23.2 | -4.8 | 362 |
| Operational Transparency | 8.8 | 13.7 | -4.9 | 362 |
| Contract Quality | 10.1 | 17.6 | -7.5 | 362 |
| Access Clarity | 17.7 | 26.5 | -8.8 | 362 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 7% | 14% | -7 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 4% | 12% | -8 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 7% | 11% | -4 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 7% | 14% | -7 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Amazon GameLift 65.4
- 2 Immutable 64.4
- 3 Appcharge 61.8
- 4 Parsec 60.4
- 5 Linden Lab 60.3
- 6 GZW Data API 59.7
- 7 Block Lottos 55.5
- 8 B3 55
- 9 Coda Payments 53.6
- 10 Lucra Sports 53.5
- 1 Appcharge 62.5
- 2 Immutable 58.9
- 3 Gamesight 44.8
- 4 Block Lottos 40.5
- 5 crob.at 40.5
- 6 LootRush 40.1
- 7 Fnatic 40
- 8 Battle.net 38.8
- 9 Blockade Games 38.6
- 10 Lucra Sports 38.4
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.