Gaming
Gaminggaming
Providers using this tag (420)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 6 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 36 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 47 Limited public surface area
Emerging 82 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 220 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 28 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (50)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 7 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 21 Limited public surface area
Emerging 20 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (4)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Gaming” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 345 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Gaming, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discoverability | 58.4 | 61.2 | -2.8 | 345 |
| Contract Governance | 3.6 | 6.4 | -2.8 | 345 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 18.9 | 23.4 | -4.5 | 345 |
| Operational Transparency | 9 | 13.9 | -4.9 | 345 |
| Contract Quality | 11.3 | 19.8 | -8.5 | 345 |
| Access Clarity | 17.6 | 26.5 | -8.9 | 345 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 6% | 10% | -4 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 6% | 13% | -7 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 7% | 11% | -4 |
| Security | 93% | 96% | -3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 6% | 14% | -8 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Immutable 69.1
- 2 Appcharge 65.4
- 3 GZW Data API 62
- 4 Amazon GameLift 59.1
- 5 Linden Lab 59.1
- 6 Coda Payments 56.8
- 7 Lucra Sports 56.6
- 8 Neon Commerce 52.9
- 9 Parsec 52.7
- 10 crob.at 52
- 1 Appcharge 62.5
- 2 Immutable 58.9
- 3 Gamesight 44.8
- 4 Fnatic 44.6
- 5 Blockade Games 40.8
- 6 crob.at 40.5
- 7 LootRush 40.1
- 8 Battle.net 38.8
- 9 Lucra Sports 38.4
- 10 Gala Games 37
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.