Generative AI
GenAIGenerative AI
Providers using this tag (270)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 23 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 61 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 37 Limited public surface area
Emerging 74 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 67 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (74)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 10 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 13 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 24 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 15 Limited public surface area
Emerging 12 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (24)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Generative AI” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
270 providers carry this tag directly, and 566 counting the 2 narrower tags below — 296 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 265 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Generative AI, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 32.5 | 23.2 | +9.3 | 265 |
| Access Clarity | 34.8 | 26.5 | +8.3 | 265 |
| Operational Transparency | 18.3 | 13.7 | +4.6 | 265 |
| Discoverability | 62.6 | 58.1 | +4.5 | 265 |
| Contract Quality | 20.9 | 17.6 | +3.3 | 265 |
| Contract Governance | 6.5 | 6.3 | +0.2 | 265 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 27% | 14% | +13 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 26% | 12% | +14 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 14% | 11% | +3 |
| Security | 98% | 98% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 5% | 2% | +3 |
| Governance rules | 11% | 14% | -3 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 AutoContent API 65.9
- 2 Adobe 65
- 3 Bria 65
- 4 FLORA 62.4
- 5 Prezent 59.5
- 6 Recipe API 59
- 7 SpAItial 57.7
- 8 Lacuna 57.2
- 9 OpenAI 57.1
- 10 Jasper 56.7
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.