niche · -1.8 market domain

Portfolio Management

Score 17.9 / 100 52 providers +6 via APIs 16 APIs Search apis.io →

Providers using this tag (52)

Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.

Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 6 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Emerging 21 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 15 Almost no public developer surface

APIs with this tag (16)

Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →

Developing 1 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 7 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface

Companies reaching this through an API (6)

These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Portfolio Management” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.

Bloomberg Financial Solutions Calypso Deribit Stifel Financial WealthKernel Western And Southern Financial

Score breakdown

Frequency
49.5
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
1.2
spread across providers
Quality lift
21.5
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
6.1
strength of nearest seed neighbor

Where this tag sits

Investment broader

Related tags

Hedge Funds 5 co-occurrences Wealth Management 16 co-occurrences Investment Management 7 co-occurrences Asset Management 12 co-occurrences Investing 10 co-occurrences Financial Data 10 co-occurrences Investment 10 co-occurrences Portfolio 6 co-occurrences

Where this tag comes from

Provider tag53
Api tag16
Openapi tag1
Openapi op tag3

Cohort brief

Auto-generated

The 49 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Portfolio Management, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.

Providers
49
of 52 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
21.6
-0.6 vs catalog 22.2
Mean Agent Readiness
10.5
-1.5 vs catalog 12
Spread
3.4–59
median 18 · σ 13.4
How the 49 split by band
Exemplar 0Strong 1Developing 6Thin 9Emerging 21Minimal 12
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
FacetThis cohortCatalogDifferenceScored
Access Clarity 27.5 23.9 +3.6 49
Discoverability 59.8 57.9 +1.9 49
Contract Governance 7 6.5 +0.5 49
Operational Transparency 10.2 13 -2.8 49
Contract Quality 14.3 17.2 -2.9 49
Developer Ergonomics 20.3 23.2 -2.9 49

A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.

What this cohort publishes
ArtifactThis cohortCatalogDifference
MCP server (any) 8% 13% -5
MCP server (first-party) 6% 12% -6
Agent Skills 0% 0% 0
OAuth scopes 10% 11% -1
Security 100% 98% +2
Arazzo workflows 0% 2% -2
Governance rules 18% 16% +2

mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.

Top by Kin Score
  1. 1 Standard Metrics 59
  2. 2 Bloomberg AIM 45
  3. 3 Arch 44
  4. 4 Liquid Agent 43.3
  5. 5 ReqArchitect 43.2
  6. 6 ARGUS Enterprise 39.7
  7. 7 1Token 39.6
  8. 8 Bloomberg Buyside Enterprise Solutions 38.5
  9. 9 Addepar 37
  10. 10 BlackRock 35.7
Top by Agent Readiness
  1. 1 Standard Metrics 53.6
  2. 2 DriveWealth 35.3
  3. 3 1Token 34
  4. 4 Saxo Bank 30.9
  5. 5 Liquid Agent 30.5
  6. 6 Bamboo Invest 28.4
  7. 7 ReqArchitect 26.6
  8. 8 BlackRock 26.5
  9. 9 Bloomberg Buyside Enterprise Solutions 26
  10. 10 Bloomberg AIM 25.4
All 52 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the catalog; 49 carry a score (94%). The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 46 of 49 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.

Work with this as data

Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for tags

7 MCP tools reach this
  • find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.
  • get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.
  • cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.
  • cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.
  • apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
  • resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
  • find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page
This tag
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/portfolio-management"
All tags
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
As a scored cohort
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/portfolio-management"
The distribution (Pro)
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/portfolio-management/stats" \
  -H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"

Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.

Get an API key

Free tier, no form to fill in. Signing in shares your email address with us — we store it to create your key and to recognise you if you sign in with another provider. See our Privacy Policy and Terms.

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.