Portfolio-Management
Portfolio ManagementPortfolio-Management
Providers using this tag (47)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 9 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Emerging 17 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 10 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (19)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 2 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 7 Limited public surface area
Emerging 10 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (8)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Portfolio-Management” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 45 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Portfolio-Management, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 32.6 | 26.5 | +6.1 | 45 |
| Contract Governance | 9.1 | 6.4 | +2.7 | 45 |
| Discoverability | 62.8 | 61.2 | +1.6 | 45 |
| Contract Quality | 19.8 | 19.8 | 0 | 45 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 22.9 | 23.4 | -0.5 | 45 |
| Operational Transparency | 12.6 | 14 | -1.4 | 45 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 4% | 10% | -6 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 7% | 13% | -6 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 13% | 11% | +2 |
| Security | 100% | 97% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 27% | 14% | +13 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 LeanKit 60.9
- 2 Standard Metrics 56.4
- 3 Bloomberg AIM 49.7
- 4 Oracle Primavera 43.7
- 5 Arch 42.9
- 6 Bloomberg Buyside Enterprise Solutions 42.4
- 7 ARGUS Enterprise 42.3
- 8 1Token 42.2
- 9 Microsoft Project 42
- 10 DriveWealth 41.9
- 1 LeanKit 42.9
- 2 DriveWealth 37.1
- 3 1Token 36.5
- 4 Standard Metrics 34.7
- 5 eToro 31.9
- 6 Saxo Bank 31.6
- 7 Bamboo Invest 29.8
- 8 Bloomberg Buyside Enterprise Solutions 27.3
- 9 Bloomberg AIM 26.5
- 10 Arch 26.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.