Portfolio Management
Providers using this tag (50)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 8 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Emerging 18 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 13 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (18)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 2 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 6 Limited public surface area
Emerging 10 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (7)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Portfolio Management” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 47 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Portfolio Management, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 32.1 | 26.5 | +5.6 | 47 |
| Contract Governance | 8.7 | 6.3 | +2.4 | 47 |
| Discoverability | 60.2 | 58.1 | +2.1 | 47 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 23.8 | 23.2 | +0.6 | 47 |
| Contract Quality | 17.8 | 17.6 | +0.2 | 47 |
| Operational Transparency | 12 | 13.7 | -1.7 | 47 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 9% | 14% | -5 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 6% | 12% | -6 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 13% | 11% | +2 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 23% | 14% | +9 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 LeanKit 61.3
- 2 Standard Metrics 58.9
- 3 Bloomberg AIM 45.1
- 4 Microsoft Project 45.1
- 5 Oracle Primavera 44.9
- 6 Arch 43.9
- 7 Liquid Agent 43.8
- 8 ARGUS Enterprise 41.2
- 9 DriveWealth 39.7
- 10 1Token 39.5
- 1 Standard Metrics 50.9
- 2 LeanKit 40.8
- 3 DriveWealth 37.1
- 4 1Token 34
- 5 eToro 31.9
- 6 Saxo Bank 31.6
- 7 Liquid Agent 29
- 8 Bloomberg Buyside Enterprise Solutions 27.3
- 9 Bloomberg AIM 26.5
- 10 Microsoft Project 26.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.