India RBI / SEBI Registers (SEBI intermediaries, RBI NBFCs, payment aggregators, PPI issuers, AAs)

Where this market publishes its structure

• SEBI registered intermediaries (sebi.gov.in OtherAction.do?doRecognisedFpi=yes&intmId=30,13,14,8,33,18,19,10,27,7,47,9,23; as on 21 Oct 2026) machine-readable, 10,459 records (5,003 brokers, 1,058 IAs, 2,304 RAs, 540 PMS, 754 + 355 DPs, 253 merchant bankers, 80 RTAs, 61 MFs, 19 ESG raters, 18 custodians, 9 CRAs, 5 KRAs) -> 6,822 names; 10 linked by e-mail domain; 27 held; 2,439 corporate-domain names no repo holds; 4,335 free-mail / no-email names with no register-name match
• SEBI UPI apps for public issues (intmId=43) not machine-readable: lists app names in a different table, not registrant legal names; not an entity register -- skipped
• RBI authorised payment system operators / payment aggregators / PPI issuers (PublicationsView id=12043) machine-readable, READ BY india-rbi-regulated-entities 2026-10-22; not re-read, its edges reused (cohort)
• RBI NBFC / NBFC-AA lists (rbi.org.in BS_NBFCList.aspx -> rbidocs XLSX) not machine-readable: recorded unreadable by india-rbi-regulated-entities 2026-10-22 (rbidocs behind an F5 TSPD JavaScript bot challenge); not retried past the challenge
• Sahamati AA ecosystem (sahamati.org.in/aa-ecosystem/) not machine-readable: 301 to a governance calendar (india-rbi-regulated-entities 2026-10-22); the Sahamati AA / FIP / FIU lists are READ BY india-stack -> edges reused, not re-read

Own = declares at least one integration itself; covered = visible only because an aggregator, standards body, regulator or partner contract names it; distribution-only = listed only on cloud marketplaces it sells through, a channel reported beside, never counted as its own declared integrations; undeclared = nothing we can read, so no number; declares_compatibility = providers with a `compatible` shape vote, report only (kin, 2026-10-13): never counted as own, never in depth or position.

Taxonomy how this market maps onto apis.io

Derived 2026-10-23 from the 115 providers in this market we could resolve in the catalog. The percentage is the share of those providers carrying each one; it describes the market, not the tag or industry. Tag groups have no page of their own yet, so they are listed unlinked.

share of resolved cohort carrying it; tags >=0.20 & >=3 members (max 12, junk dropped), tag_groups >=0.20 (cooccurrence, non-cross-cutting; max 8), industries >=0.20 (max 6), areas >=0.10 (max 6; areas are keyword-matched and sparse), capabilities L1 >=0.20 (max 8); derive-market-taxonomy.py

Leaders by position (provisional)

Provisional: grouped by position, depth compared within a position only. Distribution (cloud marketplaces) and iPaaS bridges are counted beside position, never inside it. Unknown-builder listings are left out of position shares and counted here.

undeclared 115 · declares nothing we can read: no number