Brazil BCB Authorized Institutions (Banco Central do Brasil register beyond Pix)

Where this market publishes its structure

• BCB open data CKAN relacao-de-instituicoes-em-funcionamento-no-pais -> Olinda Instituicoes_em_funcionamento v1 OData (SedesBancoComMultCE, SedesSociedades, SedesCooperativas, SedesConsorcios, DominiosVerificados) machine-readable, 1,740 institutions (170 banks, 195 IP, 138 SCD, 11 SEP, 344 other sociedades, 752 co-ops, 130 consórcio); 1,892 domain rows (535 own-verified, 279 conglomerate); 48 providers linked (ip 28, bank 13, other 11, scd 3, sep 0)
• Olinda Informes_ListaTarifasPorInstituicaoFinanceira v1 (ListaInstituicoesDeGrupoConsolidado, groups 15/12/13/14) machine-readable, 1,756 CNPJs; confirmation only (tariff_list_confirmed); the _ListaTarifasPorInstituicaoFinanceira entity set returns 500 unparameterised
• Olinda BcBase v2 EntidadesSupervisionadas machine-readable, 5,724 rows at dataBase '10/01/2026' (MM/DD/YYYY; ISO and DD/MM return 500); 1,741 Autorizada em Atividade; 3 register rows authorised-without-activity not linked
• Pix participants CSV machine-readable, NOT re-read: latam-open-finance reads it; its edges reused

Own = declares at least one integration itself; covered = visible only because an aggregator, standards body, regulator or partner contract names it; distribution-only = listed only on cloud marketplaces it sells through, a channel reported beside, never counted as its own declared integrations; undeclared = nothing we can read, so no number; declares_compatibility = providers with a `compatible` shape vote, report only (kin, 2026-10-13): never counted as own, never in depth or position.

Taxonomy how this market maps onto apis.io

Derived 2026-10-23 from the 94 providers in this market we could resolve in the catalog. The percentage is the share of those providers carrying each one; it describes the market, not the tag or industry. Tag groups have no page of their own yet, so they are listed unlinked.

share of resolved cohort carrying it; tags >=0.20 & >=3 members (max 12, junk dropped), tag_groups >=0.20 (cooccurrence, non-cross-cutting; max 8), industries >=0.20 (max 6), areas >=0.10 (max 6; areas are keyword-matched and sparse), capabilities L1 >=0.20 (max 8); derive-market-taxonomy.py

Leaders by position (provisional)

Provisional: grouped by position, depth compared within a position only. Distribution (cloud marketplaces) and iPaaS bridges are counted beside position, never inside it. Unknown-builder listings are left out of position shares and counted here.

gravity 2 · other companies invest to build on it

builds-on 2 · publishes apps on other platforms' stores

regulated 42 · named in a regulator's register or partners' contracts

standard 5 · listed by a voluntary standard's own directory

core 2 · builds the connectors its customers need

mixed 3 · no single mode dominates

long-tail 1 · reached only through iPaaS bridges

distribution 1 · only sells through cloud marketplaces

undeclared 36 · declares nothing we can read: no number

Top workflows by market votes

Workflows (Arazzo) and their phrasing are generated by API Evangelist, ranked by market votes (integration edges in the graph, weighted by channel).

In-market workflows only: a step on the market provider's side maps to this market's business capabilities (), and the partner is not a generic export/notify app. Other workflows are counted as bridges (including any whose steps do not resolve to a capability yet). Methodology. In-market: 64; bridges: 0.