Search
Searchsearch
Providers using this tag (185)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 5 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 16 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 73 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 45 Limited public surface area
Emerging 28 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 8 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 10 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (943)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 79 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 112 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 314 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 303 Limited public surface area
Emerging 130 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 4 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (727)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Search” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 727 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 174 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Search, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 41.7 | 19.8 | +21.9 | 174 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 40.1 | 23.4 | +16.7 | 174 |
| Access Clarity | 41.2 | 26.5 | +14.7 | 174 |
| Operational Transparency | 26.2 | 13.9 | +12.3 | 174 |
| Discoverability | 70.3 | 61.2 | +9.1 | 174 |
| Contract Governance | 9.9 | 6.4 | +3.5 | 174 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 25% | 10% | +15 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 29% | 13% | +16 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 16% | 11% | +5 |
| Security | 95% | 96% | -1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 4% | 2% | +2 |
| Governance rules | 27% | 14% | +13 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Elastic Stack (ELK Stack) 76.7
- 2 Algolia 71.5
- 3 Bloomreach 67.2
- 4 Shodan 67.2
- 5 Google Search Console 66.8
- 6 Crawl4AI 65.6
- 7 Google Indexing 62.3
- 8 Ahrefs 62.1
- 9 SerpWow 61.5
- 10 Geekflare 60.9
- 1 Bloomreach 63.7
- 2 Algolia 61.5
- 3 Mem 61.3
- 4 Exa 57.1
- 5 Sylvia API 55.6
- 6 AnyAPI 55.4
- 7 Ahrefs 51.8
- 8 Insider 51.6
- 9 TinyFish 49
- 10 Elastic Stack (ELK Stack) 48.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.