Vendor CLIs in the Arch User Repository
Distribution market (vendors' own command-line tools packaged for arch linux; providers ranked). The Kin Score Market layer reads each provider in its market: who it integrates with, how deep those integrations go, and where the market publishes its own structure. Methodology.
Where this market publishes its structure
- AUR full metadata dump (aur.archlinux.org/packages-meta-ext-v1.json.gz) machine-readable, 122,754 packages; 7,478 described as a CLI; 6,710 no catalog holder for the upstream host / org; 69 upstream on a package-registry page (held); 351 passed the upstream leg
- AUR .SRCINFO (aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/.SRCINFO?h=
) machine-readable, 351 fetched, 0 unreadable; 236 linked / 148 providers; 6,314 (provider, package) pairs held (2,875 shared GitHub org, 2,576 name check, 400 no own domain, 292 artifact not the vendor's, 12 hand review) - AUR RPC v5 (aur.archlinux.org/rpc/v5/info, /search) machine-readable, same fields as the dump; used for the 15-link spot check only
- AUR /cgit/aur.git/plain and /snapshot not machine-readable: disallowed by robots.txt; not read
- AUR maintainer accounts (/account/*) not machine-readable: disallowed by robots.txt and login-only; maintainer identity is never a publisher leg
Own = declares at least one integration itself; covered = visible only because an aggregator, standards body, regulator or partner contract names it; distribution-only = listed only on cloud marketplaces it sells through, a channel reported beside, never counted as its own declared integrations; undeclared = nothing we can read, so no number; declares_compatibility = providers with a `compatible` shape vote, report only (kin, 2026-10-13): never counted as own, never in depth or position.
Taxonomy how this market maps onto apis.io
Derived 2026-10-23 from the 16 providers in this market we could resolve in the catalog. The percentage is the share of those providers carrying each one; it describes the market, not the tag or industry. Tag groups have no page of their own yet, so they are listed unlinked.
| Tags | Open Source 44%, Cloud 31%, Developer Tools 25% |
|---|---|
| Tag groups | Infrastructure 31%, Developer Tools 25% |
| Industries | Developer Tools & DevOps 56%, Artificial Intelligence 25% |
| Areas | Containers 19%, Serverless 12% |
| Capabilities | Cybersecurity Management 31%, Software Release & Deployment Management 25% |
share of resolved cohort carrying it; tags >=0.20 & >=3 members (max 12, junk dropped), tag_groups >=0.20 (cooccurrence, non-cross-cutting; max 8), industries >=0.20 (max 6), areas >=0.10 (max 6; areas are keyword-matched and sparse), capabilities L1 >=0.20 (max 8); derive-market-taxonomy.py
Leaders by position (provisional)
Provisional: grouped by position, depth compared within a position only. Distribution (cloud marketplaces) and iPaaS bridges are counted beside position, never inside it. Unknown-builder listings are left out of position shares and counted here.
builds-on 5 · publishes apps on other platforms' stores
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bitwarden | 52.4 | 18 | 0 / 18 | 1 | 6 | 1 | ipaas-bridge 5%, standard 11%, covered 5%, builds-on-platform 42%, distribution 32%, unknown 5% |
| Supabase | 51.8 | 17 | 0 / 17 | 1 | 3 | 2 | ipaas-bridge 12%, standard 12%, covered 6%, builds-on-platform 47%, distribution 18%, unknown 6% |
| LocalStack | 38.0 | 10 | 0 / 10 | 0 | 7 | 0 | standard 9%, builds-on-platform 27%, distribution 64% |
| Firecrawl | 35.8 | 7 | 0 / 7 | 0 | 1 | 2 | ipaas-bridge 29%, standard 14%, builds-on-platform 43%, distribution 14% |
| Frappe | 26.8 thin | 2 | 0 / 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | builds-on-platform 50%, distribution 50% |
covered 1 · reached mainly through aggregators
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moonshot AI | 44.1 | 6 | 0 / 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | covered 67%, distribution 33% |
standard 5 · listed by a voluntary standard's own directory
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OVH Cloud | 54.3 | 13 | 0 / 13 | 0 | 2 | 0 | standard 46%, covered 15%, builds-on-platform 23%, distribution 15% |
| Docker | 49.6 | 14 | 0 / 14 | 0 | 5 | 0 | standard 36%, builds-on-platform 29%, distribution 36% |
| Red Hat OpenShift | 42.5 | 5 | 0 / 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | standard 60%, distribution 40% |
| Arduino | 37.3 | 6 | 0 / 6 | 0 | 4 | 0 | standard 33%, distribution 67% |
| IPinfo | 35.3 | 13 | 0 / 13 | 0 | 9 | 2 | ipaas-bridge 15%, standard 8%, builds-on-platform 8%, distribution 69% |
mixed 4 · no single mode dominates
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 63.2 | 44 | 0 / 44 | 0 | 5 | 7 | ipaas-bridge 21%, contract 9%, standard 18%, covered 15%, builds-on-platform 21%, distribution 15% | |
| Tenstorrent | 46.0 | 4 | 0 / 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | standard 25%, covered 25%, builds-on-platform 25%, distribution 25% |
| Rancher | 44.8 | 11 | 0 / 11 | 0 | 4 | 0 | standard 33%, builds-on-platform 33%, distribution 33% |
| Bazel | 44.1 | 3 | 0 / 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | standard 33%, builds-on-platform 33%, distribution 33% |
distribution 1 · only sells through cloud marketplaces
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entire | 19.2 thin | 2 | 0 / 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | distribution 100% |
Generated 2026-10-24 from API Evangelist's own files; nothing on this page is a model's judgement. Provisional and unweighted; not part of the Kin Score composite or agent readiness. Read the Market layer methodology. Disagree with an edge? Every edge cites its evidence and can be corrected through the normal correction path.