Prompt Driven

Prompt Driven (PDD) is the company behind Prompt-Driven Development, a prompt-native programming system in which .prompt files are the human-authored source language and traditional code (Python, TypeScript, Go, and others) is generated as an artifact. PDD ships as a single open-source Python CLI, pdd-cli, plus a local web interface, and offers agentic commands that implement GitHub issues automatically through a Define -> Generate -> Verify -> Test -> Update cycle. Positioned as "The Last Programming Language," the project is MIT-licensed, maintained by Greg Tanaka, and backed by 500 Global. It is a developer tool rather than a hosted API — there is no public REST/GraphQL API, OpenAPI spec, or MCP server; the developer surface is the CLI and its GitHub repository.

Prompt Driven is profiled on the APIs.io network. Tagged areas include Company, Developer Tools, Artificial Intelligence, Code Generation, and Developer Experience.

Prompt Driven’s developer surface includes documentation, support, CLI, changelog, and 14 more developer resources.

🌐 Visit website 📡 Profile data on GitHub

20.7/100 emerging ▬ flat Agent 4/100 human only Front door AI 6/6 dominant Heartbeat 71/100 slowing open core · MIT Full breakdown ↓
scored 2026-11-06 · rubric v0.27.0 · Show this score on your site →

0 APIs

Company Developer Tools Artificial Intelligence Code Generation Developer Experience CLI LLM

Kin Score

Kin Score How this is scored →
scored 2026-11-06 · rubric v0.27.0

Composite quality — 20.7/100 · emerging

Contract Quality 0.0 / 19

Developer Ergonomics 4.3 / 15

Access Clarity 3.2 / 15

Operational Transparency 1.8 / 10

Contract Governance 0.0 / 9

Discoverability 4.2 / 8

Regulatory Posture 1.9 / 15

Open Source Surface 5.0 / 10

Agent readiness — 4/100 · human only

Machine-Readable Contract 0 / 18

Agentic Access Contract 0 / 10

Documented Reversibility 0 / 6

MCP Server 0 / 12

Machine-Readable Auth 0 / 10

Idempotency 0 / 9

Stable Error Semantics 0 / 8

Request/Response Examples 0 / 7

Rate-Limit Signaling 0 / 7

Typed Event Surface 0 / 6

Agent Skills 5 / 5

Well-Known Catalog 0 / 4

Consent & Bot Identity 0 / 3

A2A Agent Card 0 / 8

Dry-Run / Simulate Mode 0 / 4

Delegated User Identity 0 / 6

Protected Resource Metadata 0 / 5

Registration Without a Human 0 / 6

Agentic Commerce Well-Known Document 0 / 5

Pagination 5 / 5

Distinct Operations 3 / 3

MCP Tool Quality 6 / 6

Regulatory Posture applies to this provider. Its tags matched the Horizontal (data, software, accessibility, platform) regime, so Regulatory Posture carries 15 points of the composite. If this regime is wrong for your business, say so on your provider repo — the applicability map is public and we will correct it.

Open Source Surface applies to this provider. This product is open source and we read its repository directly, so Open Source Surface carries 10 points of the composite. It is scored from what the repository actually publishes — a security policy, a contribution guide, a release history, a code of conduct — read live from the provider rather than inferred from our own catalog pointers. This facet adds; nothing was taken away to make room for it. An open-source project is not excused from the commercial facets, because exemption would strip it of the points it does earn. If we have the wrong repository, or this product is not open source, say so on your provider repo and we will drop the facet rather than have you publish against it.

Create-or-Update Ergonomics could not be measured. We hold no machine-readable contract for this provider to read, so there is nothing to measure a write surface against. Excluded rather than scored zero: never-measured and measured-empty are different facts. Publishing an OpenAPI is what makes this facet — and several others — scorable at all.

The six quality facets above are damped to 75 points between them, because both conditional facets apply and carry 25 points together. That is why each facet's contribution is shown against a damped maximum: raising a quality facet moves the composite by 75% of its nominal weight, not 100%. The full arithmetic is at apis.io/rating/.

Show this score on your site.

It updates itself when the score changes. Paste this where you link to your API docs:

<a href="https://apis.io/providers/prompt-driven/"><img src="https://apis.io/badge/prompt-driven/card.svg" alt="Prompt Driven on APIs.io — Kin Score by API Evangelist"></a>

Other styles, a README pill and a shields.io endpoint are on the badge page.

Raise your score.

Agent readiness — checks not met, largest first (exact, from this profile):

Machine-Readable Contract +18 pts — api_specs includes an OpenAPI document
MCP Server +12 pts — deployment.mode + probe verdict on the mcp/ manifest, not the pointer; an unprobed slug falls back to authorship
Agentic Access Contract +10 pts — agentic_access artifact present (x-agentic-access), graded by author
Machine-Readable Auth +10 pts — a served openid-configuration/oauth-authorization-server carrying `issuer` (served), else the securitySchemes class in the provider OpenAPIs — bound (mutualTLS, DPoP, Signature) > negotiable (oauth2 authorizationCode/clientCredentials, openIdConnect) > bearer (http bearer, apiKey)
Idempotency +9 pts — OpenAPI mutating operations declare an idempotency key — a header, a request-body property, or a named de-duplication token whose own description says so (verified); else common[].type matches /idempoten/i (documented)
Stable Error Semantics +8 pts — OpenAPI $refs a shared error schema across 4xx/5xx responses (verified), else common[].type includes ErrorCatalog / ErrorCodes / DeclineCodes

12 more unmet checks in the Agent Readiness table above.

Kin Score — facets with the most composite points still available (weight × headroom):

Contract Quality scores 0.0 — up to +25.0 composite points
Access Clarity scores 21.1 — up to +15.8 composite points
Developer Ergonomics scores 28.6 — up to +14.3 composite points

Each check links to what satisfies it. Publish the artifact, or tell us where it already lives, and the score moves on the next scoring run.

Improve this rating by publishing the missing artifacts — every area above can be raised, and the full rubric is at apis.io/rating/. Every facet and dimension name above is a link: it opens that measurement's own page — what it means, the exact checks that feed it, how the whole catalog distributes on it, and the providers at the top of it. This rating is computed from the provider profile at artifacts.apis.io/prompt-driven/apis.yml: open an issue on github.com/api-evangelist/prompt-driven to ask a question or point us at an artifact you publish. Submit an artifact on GitHub — free → Manage your own listing — the Influence plan, $499/mo →

Markets this provider is in provisional

The Kin Score Market layer reads a provider inside its market: its position, and how deep its integrations go. Depth is only comparable within a position. Provisional and unweighted: not part of the Kin Score or agent readiness.

Market	Position	Depth	Registered MCP server	Declares compatibility
Agent Skills (SKILL.md packages)	undeclared	-	-	2

Registered MCP server and declares compatibility are report only — not weighted. Undeclared means we found nothing we can read, so there is no number: we never infer integrations.

Standards implemented 1

Standards this provider implements or carries. De facto ones are profiled and measured by the API Commons; formal ones come from the standards directory and are linked by the provider's own tags. The evidence column says how each claim was established — not that it was made.

Agent Skills

measured — observed by APIs.io (published)

Security Posture 1

Authentication, domain security, vulnerability disclosure, and trust-center signals.

Prompt Driven Domain Security

TLSv1.3 · HSTS · DMARC

SECURITY

Resources

Documentation 2

Reference material describing how the API behaves

ContributionGuide

ContributionGuide

Documentation

Documentation

Agent Surfaces 3

MCP servers, agent skills, and machine-readable catalogs

AgentSkill

AgentSkill

LLMsTxt

LLMsTxt

WellKnown

WellKnown

Build 4

SDKs, sample code, and the tooling you integrate with

GitHubOrganization

SourceCode

Packages

CLI

Access & Security 1

Authentication, authorization, and security posture

DomainSecurity

DomainSecurity

Operate 4

Status, limits, changes, and where to get help

IssueTracker

Releases

Support

ChangeLog

Commercial 3

Pricing, plans, and the legal terms of use

License

License

TermsOfService

TermsOfService

PrivacyPolicy

PrivacyPolicy

Company 1

The organization behind the API

Website

Website

Source (apis.yml)

aid: prompt-driven
deliveryModel:
  model: open-core
  license: MIT
  open_source: true
  commercial: true
  callable_host: false
  label: Open core · an OSS project plus a commercial hosted product
  confidence: high
  source:
  - license
  - pricing
  generated: '2026-08-28'
  method: derived
accessModel:
  pricing: unknown
  onboarding: unknown
  trial: false
  try_now: false
  public: false
  label: Unknown
  confidence: low
  source:
  - security
  generated: '2026-11-06'
  method: derived
image: https://kinlane-images.s3.amazonaws.com/shared/apis-json/icons/prompt-driven.png
name: Prompt Driven
description: Prompt Driven (PDD) is the company behind Prompt-Driven Development, a prompt-native programming system in which
  .prompt files are the human-authored source language and traditional code (Python, TypeScript, Go, and others) is generated
  as an artifact. PDD ships as a single open-source Python CLI, pdd-cli, plus a local web interface, and offers agentic commands
  that implement GitHub issues automatically through a Define -> Generate -> Verify -> Test -> Update cycle. Positioned as
  "The Last Programming Language," the project is MIT-licensed, maintained by Greg Tanaka, and backed by 500 Global. It is
  a developer tool rather than a hosted API — there is no public REST/GraphQL API, OpenAPI spec, or MCP server; the developer
  surface is the CLI and its GitHub repository.
url: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/api-evangelist/prompt-driven/refs/heads/main/apis.yml
x-type: company
x-source: vc-portfolio
x-backed-by:
- 500-global
x-tier: stub
x-tier-reason: portfolio-lead
specificationVersion: '0.23'
created: '2026-07-17'
modified: '2026-07-20'
tags:
- Company
- Developer Tools
- Artificial Intelligence
- Code Generation
- Developer Experience
- CLI
- LLM
apis: []
maintainers:
- FN: Kin Lane
  email: kin@apievangelist.com
- FN: APIs.json
  email: info@apis.io
common:
- type: IssueTracker
  url: https://github.com/promptdriven/pdd/issues
- type: Releases
  url: https://github.com/promptdriven/pdd/releases
- type: ContributionGuide
  url: https://github.com/promptdriven/pdd/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md
- type: License
  name: MIT
  url: https://github.com/promptdriven/pdd/blob/main/LICENSE
- type: Website
  url: https://promptdriven.ai
- type: GitHubOrganization
  url: https://github.com/promptdriven
- type: SourceCode
  url: https://github.com/promptdriven/pdd
- type: Documentation
  url: https://github.com/promptdriven/pdd#readme
- type: Support
  url: https://discord.gg/Yp4RTh8bG7
- type: TermsOfService
  url: https://promptdriven.ai/terms-of-service
- type: PrivacyPolicy
  url: https://promptdriven.ai/privacy-policy
- type: Packages
  url: packages/prompt-driven-packages.yml
- type: CLI
  url: cli/prompt-driven-cli.yml
- type: ChangeLog
  url: changelog/prompt-driven-changelog.yml
- type: AgentSkill
  url: skills/_index.yml
- type: LLMsTxt
  url: llms/prompt-driven-llms.txt
- type: WellKnown
  url: well-known/prompt-driven-well-known.yml
- type: DomainSecurity
  url: security/prompt-driven-domain-security.yml
x-enrichment:
  date: '2026-07-20'
  status: enriched
  artifacts_added: 8
  pass: local-v1

Work with this as data

Every provider here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for providers

9 MCP tools reach this

find_providersBrowse and filter every provider in the catalog.
get_provider_artifactsEvery artifact this provider publishes, grouped by type.
get_provider_operationsEvery operation across all of their OpenAPIs — one call instead of parsing every spec.
get_provider_toolsEvery MCP tool they ship, with the operation each wraps.
get_provider_evidenceHow each part of their score was established. Free — the basis for a claim should not sit behind it.
get_provider_ratingPRO — composite, band, trend and facet scores.
apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.

All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page

This provider

curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/providers/prompt-driven"

All providers

curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/providers?limit=25"

Every operation they expose

curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/providers/prompt-driven/operations?limit=25"

How their score was established

curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/providers/prompt-driven/evidence"

Calls without X-API-Key need no key. Calls with it need a paid plan — get a key.

Get an API key

Free tier, no form to fill in. Signing in shares your email address with us — we store it to create your key and to recognise you if you sign in with another provider. See our Privacy Policy and Terms.

GitHub Google LinkedIn

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.