Providers using this tag (94)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 10 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 35 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 34 Limited public surface area
Emerging 9 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 4 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (42)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 7 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 14 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 13 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 94 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged RAG, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 46 | 17.5 | +28.5 | 94 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 37.1 | 17.9 | +19.2 | 94 |
| Operational Transparency | 29.9 | 11.3 | +18.6 | 94 |
| Access Clarity | 38.9 | 22.3 | +16.6 | 94 |
| Discoverability | 73.4 | 60.4 | +13 | 94 |
| Contract Governance | 11.4 | 6.4 | +5 | 94 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 33% | 16% | +17 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 13% | 7% | +6 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 13% | 9% | +4 |
| Security | 97% | 88% | +9 |
| Arazzo workflows | 6% | 2% | +4 |
| Governance rules | 32% | 13% | +19 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 NVIDIA NIM 71.2
- 2 Dust 67.6
- 3 Vendasta 63.3
- 4 Cloudflare 62
- 5 Factiva 61.9
- 6 Compresr 61.4
- 7 Seekr 61.3
- 8 Azure Databricks 56.5
- 9 Amazon Bedrock 56.4
- 10 Vectara 56.2
- 1 NationGraph 53
- 2 Cloudflare 44.5
- 3 Airweave 44
- 4 Factiva 43.3
- 5 Kinetica 39.4
- 6 Voyant.io 38.1
- 7 Ondemand 35.8
- 8 Seekr 35.8
- 9 Auth0 34.7
- 10 Vendasta 34.3
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/rag"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/rag"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/rag/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.