Retrieval
Providers using this tag (39)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 8 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 13 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 14 Limited public surface area
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (24)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 7 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 10 Limited public surface area
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 39 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Retrieval, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 48.8 | 17.5 | +31.3 | 39 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 41.2 | 17.9 | +23.3 | 39 |
| Access Clarity | 43.3 | 22.3 | +21 | 39 |
| Operational Transparency | 30.9 | 11.3 | +19.6 | 39 |
| Discoverability | 74.3 | 60.4 | +13.9 | 39 |
| Contract Governance | 12.5 | 6.4 | +6.1 | 39 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 33% | 16% | +17 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 15% | 7% | +8 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 15% | 9% | +6 |
| Security | 97% | 88% | +9 |
| Arazzo workflows | 8% | 2% | +6 |
| Governance rules | 38% | 13% | +25 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 NVIDIA NIM 71.2
- 2 S&P Global 64.6
- 3 OpenAI 64.2
- 4 Factiva 61.9
- 5 Amazon Bedrock 56.4
- 6 Perplexity 56.3
- 7 Vectara 56.2
- 8 Mixedbread 55.6
- 9 Mixpanel 54.8
- 10 Airweave 53.7
- 1 S&P Global 63.7
- 2 Clarifeye 53.8
- 3 Kensho 53.2
- 4 Airweave 44
- 5 Factiva 43.3
- 6 OpenAI 37.7
- 7 Google Gemini 30.2
- 8 Microsoft Copilot 29.9
- 9 Perplexity 29.1
- 10 Pryon 28.9
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/retrieval"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/retrieval"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/retrieval/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.