Public APIs
Public APIPublic APIs
Providers using this tag (1173)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 18 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 36 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 30 Limited public surface area
Emerging 27 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1058 Almost no public developer surface
Showing the top 1,000 of 1,058 by rating. See them all →
APIs with this tag (20)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 8 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 6 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (20)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Public APIs” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 1024 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Public APIs, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 2.5 | 6.3 | -3.8 | 1024 |
| Discoverability | 49.1 | 58.1 | -9 | 1024 |
| Operational Transparency | 2.8 | 13.7 | -10.9 | 1024 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 10.8 | 23.2 | -12.4 | 1024 |
| Contract Quality | 5.1 | 17.6 | -12.5 | 1024 |
| Access Clarity | 4.2 | 26.5 | -22.3 | 1024 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 4% | 14% | -10 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 4% | 12% | -8 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 1% | 11% | -10 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 10% | 14% | -4 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Massive (formerly Polygon.io) 75.8
- 2 Mailboxlayer 68.9
- 3 Kraken 68
- 4 OpenSanctions 67.9
- 5 Shodan 64.4
- 6 IPinfo 64.1
- 7 positionstack 62.4
- 8 OpenWeatherMap 61.9
- 9 Geekflare 61.5
- 10 Last.fm 61.1
- 1 WebScraping.AI 65
- 2 Massive (formerly Polygon.io) 44.9
- 3 Ron Swanson Quotes 38.3
- 4 ExchangeRate-API 36.1
- 5 Frankfurter 35.8
- 6 chucknorris.io 35.4
- 7 Fortnite Tracker 35.4
- 8 GamerPower 35.4
- 9 AniList 35.3
- 10 GZW Data API 35
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.