Government
Providers using this tag (344)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 7 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 54 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 50 Limited public surface area
Emerging 91 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 140 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (137)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 10 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 13 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 12 Limited public surface area
Emerging 17 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 84 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (10)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Government” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 337 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Government, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 6.7 | 6.3 | +0.4 | 337 |
| Discoverability | 57.3 | 58.1 | -0.8 | 337 |
| Contract Quality | 16.5 | 17.6 | -1.1 | 337 |
| Operational Transparency | 11.6 | 13.7 | -2.1 | 337 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 20.6 | 23.2 | -2.6 | 337 |
| Access Clarity | 20.5 | 26.5 | -6 | 337 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 8% | 14% | -6 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 7% | 12% | -5 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 8% | 11% | -3 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 13% | 14% | -1 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 TaskHawk Systems 69.4
- 2 Seekr 63
- 3 EPA — U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 60.7
- 4 La Poste Groupe 60.5
- 5 Affinda 60.4
- 6 General Services Administration 58
- 7 Consumer Data Right (Energy) 56.5
- 8 California Privacy Protection Agency 54.9
- 9 Stotles 54.1
- 10 Ordnance Survey 53.9
- 1 OpenGov 63.1
- 2 Starbridge 62.9
- 3 Stotles 57.7
- 4 Affinda 54.2
- 5 FormAssembly 50.4
- 6 Govly 49.7
- 7 TaskHawk Systems 48.8
- 8 NationGraph 44.4
- 9 GOV.UK Pay 42.7
- 10 Bargo Congress Trades API 42.3
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.