GovTech
Providers using this tag (54)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Developing 7 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 4 Limited public surface area
Emerging 23 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 20 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (0)
No API pages are linked for this tag yet. Search apis.io →
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 52 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged GovTech, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 5.2 | 6.3 | -1.1 | 52 |
| Access Clarity | 25.4 | 26.5 | -1.1 | 52 |
| Discoverability | 55.9 | 58.1 | -2.2 | 52 |
| Operational Transparency | 7.2 | 13.7 | -6.5 | 52 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 16.5 | 23.2 | -6.7 | 52 |
| Contract Quality | 8.3 | 17.6 | -9.3 | 52 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 12% | 14% | -2 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 12% | 12% | 0 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 8% | 11% | -3 |
| Security | 98% | 98% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 0% | 14% | -14 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Stotles 54.1
- 2 Accela 50.6
- 3 Polyteia 48
- 4 Govly 47.9
- 5 OpenGov 43.8
- 6 NationGraph 43.4
- 7 EditalMD 41.3
- 8 CivicPlus 32.7
- 9 Mark43 28.3
- 10 Department of Better Technology 28.1
- 1 OpenGov 63.1
- 2 Stotles 57.7
- 3 Govly 49.7
- 4 NationGraph 44.4
- 5 Accela 40
- 6 EditalMD 37.9
- 7 Cloverleaf AI 32.7
- 8 Polyteia 29
- 9 CivicPlus 18.3
- 10 Mark43 17.1
Coverage caveat. 52 of 52 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.