CRM
CRMCrmcrm
Providers using this tag (360)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 25 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 52 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 85 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 70 Limited public surface area
Emerging 79 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 35 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (251)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 104 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 50 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 28 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 37 Limited public surface area
Emerging 26 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 6 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (47)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “CRM” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 339 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged CRM, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 47.6 | 26.5 | +21.1 | 339 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 38 | 23.4 | +14.6 | 339 |
| Contract Quality | 34 | 19.8 | +14.2 | 339 |
| Operational Transparency | 27.6 | 13.9 | +13.7 | 339 |
| Discoverability | 67.4 | 61.2 | +6.2 | 339 |
| Contract Governance | 9.9 | 6.4 | +3.5 | 339 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 26% | 10% | +16 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 30% | 13% | +17 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 34% | 11% | +23 |
| Security | 97% | 96% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 14% | 14% | 0 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Salesforce 87.5
- 2 Brevo 87.3
- 3 HubSpot 87.1
- 4 Ada 83.2
- 5 Close 78.8
- 6 Drippay 76.1
- 7 Zoho CRM 75.8
- 8 Thanx 74.9
- 9 ActiveCampaign 74.6
- 10 SendPulse 74.4
- 1 Drippay 66.1
- 2 lemlist 65.8
- 3 Lightfield 65.6
- 4 Apollo.io 60.4
- 5 UserGems 59.9
- 6 Demodesk 57.7
- 7 Poggio Labs 57.7
- 8 Close 57.4
- 9 HubSpot 57.2
- 10 Reevo 56.5
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.