Contacts
Contactscontacts
Providers using this tag (55)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 6 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 17 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 15 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 8 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (307)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 40 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 63 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 108 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 74 Limited public surface area
Emerging 19 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (262)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Contacts” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 262 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 50 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Contacts, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 54.3 | 19.8 | +34.5 | 50 |
| Access Clarity | 58.7 | 26.5 | +32.2 | 50 |
| Operational Transparency | 41.1 | 13.9 | +27.2 | 50 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 48.2 | 23.4 | +24.8 | 50 |
| Discoverability | 69.6 | 61.2 | +8.4 | 50 |
| Contract Governance | 12.1 | 6.4 | +5.7 | 50 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 30% | 10% | +20 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 41% | 13% | +28 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 33% | 11% | +22 |
| Security | 93% | 96% | -3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 9% | 2% | +7 |
| Governance rules | 35% | 14% | +21 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Brevo 87.3
- 2 ZoomInfo 84.7
- 3 Nylas 76.6
- 4 GetResponse 74.3
- 5 Cvent Event Cloud 69.9
- 6 Constant Contact 68.7
- 7 Infusionsoft (Keap) 65.2
- 8 Keap 65
- 9 Spruce Health 64.9
- 10 Microsoft Graph 64.1
- 1 Nylas 59.3
- 2 Brevo 54.8
- 3 ZoomInfo 54.7
- 4 Monaco 50.2
- 5 Inflection.io 49.3
- 6 Spruce Health 48.4
- 7 Salesflare 48.4
- 8 Keap 48
- 9 GetResponse 47.8
- 10 Cvent Event Cloud 46.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.