Contacts
Providers using this tag (54)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 6 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 16 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 14 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 8 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (309)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 42 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 73 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 100 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 69 Limited public surface area
Emerging 21 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 4 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (264)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Contacts” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 264 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 49 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Contacts, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 59.3 | 26.5 | +32.8 | 49 |
| Contract Quality | 49.9 | 17.6 | +32.3 | 49 |
| Operational Transparency | 41.1 | 13.7 | +27.4 | 49 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 48 | 23.2 | +24.8 | 49 |
| Discoverability | 68.4 | 58.1 | +10.3 | 49 |
| Contract Governance | 13.1 | 6.3 | +6.8 | 49 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 49% | 14% | +35 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 47% | 12% | +35 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 35% | 11% | +24 |
| Security | 98% | 98% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 10% | 2% | +8 |
| Governance rules | 39% | 14% | +25 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Nylas 93.2
- 2 ZoomInfo 87.3
- 3 Brevo 81.7
- 4 Cvent Event Cloud 71.9
- 5 GetResponse 71.6
- 6 Constant Contact 69.4
- 7 Microsoft Outlook 66
- 8 Benchmark Email 65
- 9 Inflection.io 64.6
- 10 Relm 64.5
- 1 ZoomInfo 65.8
- 2 Monaco 62.8
- 3 Relm 62.2
- 4 Brevo 58.4
- 5 Nylas 56.6
- 6 Folk 52.2
- 7 Kajabi 52.1
- 8 Actionstep 50
- 9 Inflection.io 49.3
- 10 Spruce Health 48.4
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.