Notes
Notesnotes
Providers using this tag (96)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 9 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 19 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 33 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 27 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (90)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 9 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 18 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 34 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 24 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 96 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Notes, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 51 | 17.5 | +33.5 | 96 |
| Access Clarity | 47.7 | 22.3 | +25.4 | 96 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 42.7 | 17.9 | +24.8 | 96 |
| Operational Transparency | 33.7 | 11.3 | +22.4 | 96 |
| Discoverability | 72.3 | 60.4 | +11.9 | 96 |
| Contract Governance | 17.8 | 6.4 | +11.4 | 96 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 50% | 16% | +34 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 30% | 7% | +23 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 39% | 9% | +30 |
| Security | 100% | 88% | +12 |
| Arazzo workflows | 11% | 2% | +9 |
| Governance rules | 35% | 13% | +22 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Stripe 83.2
- 2 Mailchimp 81.5
- 3 Zoho CRM 74.1
- 4 Vessel 72.1
- 5 Lightfield 71.6
- 6 Buttondown 71.5
- 7 Matomo 67.3
- 8 ActiveCampaign 67.2
- 9 Notion 66.9
- 10 CreatorIQ 66.1
- 1 Lightfield 65.6
- 2 Mem 61.3
- 3 Notion 54.5
- 4 NationGraph 53
- 5 Factset 52.8
- 6 Nooks 51.1
- 7 ActiveCampaign 47.9
- 8 Salesloft 47.9
- 9 GitLab 47.8
- 10 Stripe 47.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/notes"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/notes"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/notes/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.