Deals
Dealsdeals
Providers using this tag (50)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 7 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 7 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 10 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 8 Limited public surface area
Emerging 9 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 9 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (51)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 8 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 8 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 15 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 10 Limited public surface area
Emerging 9 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 50 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Deals, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 38.7 | 17.5 | +21.2 | 50 |
| Access Clarity | 42.9 | 22.3 | +20.6 | 50 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 35.7 | 17.9 | +17.8 | 50 |
| Operational Transparency | 26.9 | 11.3 | +15.6 | 50 |
| Discoverability | 72.1 | 60.4 | +11.7 | 50 |
| Contract Governance | 15.5 | 6.4 | +9.1 | 50 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 44% | 16% | +28 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 26% | 7% | +19 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 36% | 9% | +27 |
| Security | 100% | 88% | +12 |
| Arazzo workflows | 6% | 2% | +4 |
| Governance rules | 24% | 13% | +11 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Brevo 87.3
- 2 HubSpot 82.4
- 3 SendPulse 75.7
- 4 Lev 72.4
- 5 Vessel 72.1
- 6 Punchh 67.6
- 7 ActiveCampaign 67.2
- 8 Factset 64.8
- 9 Apollo.io 64.2
- 10 Infusionsoft (Keap) 63.4
- 1 SendPulse 55.8
- 2 Apollo.io 55.3
- 3 Lev 54.5
- 4 HubSpot 54.4
- 5 Factset 52.8
- 6 Brevo 49.6
- 7 Lone Wolf Technologies 49.3
- 8 ActiveCampaign 47.9
- 9 Opply 44.4
- 10 Fixture 41.5
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/deals"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/deals"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/deals/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.